Главная » Статьи » шашки-100 |
Section 2 : Centre play Many games show a struggle for the centre. Centre play consists of building a strong centre, putting pressure on the strategic squares of the opponent. Often this pressure is aimed at <24>. In the diagram the attack at <24> is possible with help of the so called power block. In several games of pupils of mine the power block was used with success to blow up the opponent’s position! Sometimes position were reached in games that were exactly the same positions as the practiced positions at the training. This means you can profit a lot from studying key positions. In this section we discuss:
Usually laying 27 – 21 is a weak move, but we’ll learn that sometimes the piece at <21> - especially if put in between black pieces at 26 and 17 - can be very strong. Attacking at the left wing is another strategy when having a strong centre. The attack sometimes is continued via <17> which can get quite exciting. Cannon play is very popular at modern times and is the start of several strategies. Therefore we discuss the canon play in detail. After having studied this section you will have insight in the strategies connected with centre play. Games of grandmasters will give you a hint at how to perform these plans in your own games. 1.Centre play Thijssen - BorgmanDutch club competition 2008 1.33 – 29 19 – 24 2.39 – 33 14 – 19 3.44 – 39 20 – 25 4.29 x 20 25 x 14 5.50 – 44 15 – 20 6.32 – 28 10 – 15 7.37 – 32 17 – 22 8.28 x 17 12 x 21 9.41 – 37 21 – 26The DiroD is 0. Black changed back (losing 2 temps) and changed forwards 17 – 22 x 21 (gaining 2 temps). 10.35 – 30!In the game of a grandmaster against a weaker player the former wants to complicate matters, but black refuses to play the most principal move, 20 – 25. Black likes to keep things simple, but white gets rid of a inactive piece at <35> now. 10… 7 – 12 11.30 – 25 11 – 17 12.34 – 29!Without a piece at <35> the chance of a successful attack at piece 24 after 20 – 24 x 24 will grow. 12… 17 – 21 13.39 – 34 21 – 27 14.31 x 22 18 x 27 15.32 x 21 26 x 17Black wants to change a lot of pieces. It costs him 4 temps. White is taking 31 x 22 18 x 27 because exchanging piece 18 weakens black’s centre a bit. 16.37 – 32 1 – 7 17.44 – 39 19 – 23 18.29 x 18 12 x 23 19.46 – 41 14 – 19 20.25 x 14 19 x 10 21.42 – 37 10 – 14Centre play is aimed at taking strategic squares under control. White takes centre square 28 and builds a central pyramid. Dirod goes to + 4. 22.32 – 28! 23 x 32 23.37 x 28 7 – 12 24.41 – 37 5 – 10 25.38 – 32 13 – 18 26.43 – 38 14 – 19 27.34 – 29!White takes the other centre square 29. Although black takes square 24 under control white has the opportunity to build strong formations to chase black away from 24 again. 27… 19 – 24 28.29 x 20 15 x 24 29.40 – 34 9 – 13 30.49 – 44 13 – 19 31.36 – 31 8 – 13 32.31 – 27 18 – 23 33.48 – 43 10 – 14 34.44 – 40 4 – 9White took square 27 and built strong formations in the centre and at his right wing. The 34 / 40 / 45 tail is ready to remove the opponent’s piece 24. 35.34 – 29! 23 x 34 36.40 x 20 14 x 25 37.39 – 34Tactics refrain white from playing 33 – 29? as it is punished by a coup Philippe. 37… 2 – 8 38.45 – 40 19 – 24History repeats itself. Black takes 24 again and is chased away by white once more. 39.40 – 35!White prepares the 34 – 29 move. An immediate 39.34 – 29 could have been answered by 24 – 30 and white can’t attack piece 30 by 40 – 35 because 12 – 18 17 – 22 18 – 23 13 x 42 follows. 39… 13 – 18 40.34 – 29 9 – 13?A severe mistake. Black should have changed 40… 17 – 22 preventing white from taking control over square 24. 41.29 x 20 25 x 14 42.28 – 23! 18 x 29 43.33 x 24White reaches his goal. He now controls <24>. His lead in development is + 5, which is fine in an attacking position. 43… 13 – 18 44.38 – 33 17 – 22 45.37 – 31 8 – 13 46.43 – 38 46… 22 – 28 47.33 x 22 16 – 21 48.27 x 16 18 x 36 49.32 – 28White has much more space to play now. He is only three temps ahead but piece 36 rated 7 temps is isolated from the rest of black’s pieces. 49… 12 – 18 50.35 – 30 3 – 8 51.30 – 25 8 – 12 52.24 – 20 6 – 11 53.20 x 9 13 x 4 54.16 x 7 12 x 1 55.25 – 20 4 – 9?Badly defended. After 55… 4 – 10! black keeps control over square 15 which is essential here: 55… 4 – 10! 56.38 – 33 1 – 7 57.33 – 29 7 – 11! and attacking 28 – 23 can be answered by 10 – 15 23 x 12 15 x 33 now. After 55 … 4 – 10 56.38 – 32 1 – 7 57.32 – 27 7 – 11 58.27 – 21 11 – 16 there are two variations: 1) 59.20 – 15 16 x 27 60.15 x 4 and both 27 – 31 and 36 – 41 lead to a draw. 2) 59.21 – 17 18 – 22 60.28 – 23 22 x 11 61.23 – 19 21 – 27 62.20 – 15 and again a split: 2.1) 62… 27 – 32? 63.4 – 15 32 – 37 64.19 – 14 37 – 42 65.47 x 38 36 – 41 66.14 – 10 etc. W+ 2.2) 62… 11 – 17! 63.4 x 31 36 x 27 64.19 – 14 27 – 32 65.47 – 42 17 – 22 66.14 – 10 22 – 28 67.10 – 5 28 – 33 68.5 x 41 33 – 39 and black escapes. 56.38 – 33 1 – 7 57.33 – 29 7 – 11 58.28 – 23 18 – 22 59.23 – 19 22 – 27 60.19 – 14 9 – 13 61.14 – 10 27 – 32 62.10 – 4 36 – 41 63. 4 x 6 41 – 46 64. 6 – 17!Putting pressure on <24> is the beginning of a successful centre play. Black surrendered because white will become dominant after 64… 32 – 38 65.17 – 21 or 64… 32 – 37 65.17 – 26. After 64… 46 – 37 65.17 – 26! black’s king will be captured at the next move. Koeperman – AmanWorld championship 1994 1.32 – 28 18 – 23 2.33 – 29 23 x 32 3.37 x 28 20 – 24 4.29 x 20 15 x 24 5.41 – 37 12 – 18 6.39 – 33 7 – 12 7.37 – 32 17 – 21 8.46 – 41 21 – 26 9.31 – 27A well known opening trick is 9… 26 – 31? 10.27 – 22! 18 x 27 11.32 x 21 16 x 27 12.33 – 29 24 x 22 13.38 – 32 27 x 38 14.36 x 16 W+1. 9… 11 – 17 10.41 – 37White has developed his left wing perfectly already. Pieces 46 en 41 have been centralized. 10… 17 – 22 11.28 x 17 12 x 21 12.44 – 39 2 – 7 13.50 – 44 7 – 12 14.33 – 28 18 – 23 15.38 – 33 10 – 15 16.42 – 38 5 – 10 17.47 – 42 1 – 7White built a compact position with a lot of formations. White’s position doesn’t contain any weaknesses. Black also tries to keep controlling squares 23 and 24. The next phase of the game shows a fight for control over square 23 and especially square 24. 18.34 – 29! 23 x 34 19.40 x 20 15 x 24 20.39 – 34 12 – 18 21.43 – 39 7 – 11 22.49 – 43 8 – 12 23.44 – 40 18 – 23At 23… 10 – 15 white could play the interesting Ghestem-lock 24.28 – 22! After 23… 12 – 17 24.37 – 31 26 x 37 25.42 x 31 black can’t play 21 – 26 (27 – 21!) and therefore is locked by 31 – 26. Such a lock is usually hard to play, although in this case black could have allowed it. 24.34 – 29 23 x 34 25.40 x 20 14 x 25 26.45 – 40 10 – 14 27.40 – 34 14 – 20Still all white’s pieces are working together. White takes square 29 pushing back black. 28.34 – 29 20 – 24 29.29 x 20 25 x 14 30.39 – 34 14 – 20 31.43 – 39 3 – 8 32.34 – 29 9 – 14Black could have chosen 20 – 24 29 x 20 19 – 23 28 x 19 13 x 15 39 – 34 and the position is still defendable. 33.39 – 34 20 – 25Black didn’t lose control over 24 entirely. White can’t go there. Instead, he chooses to attack through the centre. 34.29 – 23! 4 – 10 35.35 – 30 10 – 15 36.34 – 29 25 x 34 37.29 x 40 15 – 20 38.40 – 34 20 – 2538… 20 – 24 is answered by 39.34 – 29! 24 – 30 40.29 – 24 30 – 35 41.23 – 18! 13 x 31 42.24 x 2 W+. 39.33 – 29!!Very well played! White uses tactics to perform his plan. Black can’t play either 39… 26 – 31? 40.37 x 17 11 x 24 41.34 – 29! 19 x 37 42.29 x 7 W+ nor 39… 25 – 30 40.34 x 25 26 – 31 41.37 x 17 11 x 24 42.25 – 20! 19 x 37 43.20 x 7 W+. If black changes back 14 – 19 x 9 white takes square 24 by playing 29 – 24. 39… 13 – 18 40.27 – 22! 18 x 27 41.37 – 31 26 x 37 42.42 x 22 11 – 17 43.22 x 11 16 x 7 44.38 – 33 21 – 26 45.48 – 43 6 – 11 46.43 – 39White transported his golden piece to square 39, threatening 29 – 24 19 x 30 23 – 18 12 x 23 28 x 10 +. Black is driven back again. 46… 14 – 20 47.23 x 14 20 x 9 48.28 – 23 11 – 16 49.29 – 24It took a while, but after a hard struggle white finally has occupied square 24… 49… 16 – 21 50.34 – 29 50… 7 – 11?Black should have activated his 8 / 12 / 17 tail By playing 50… 21 – 27! 51.32 x 21 26 x 17 being able to change a piece at <19>. 51.23 – 19!Black can’t stop a breakthrough now… 51… 25 – 30 52.24 x 35 11 – 16 53.29 – 24 21 – 27 54.32 x 21 16 x 27 55.24 – 20 27 – 32 56.19 – 14 32 – 37 57.14 x 3 37 – 42 58.20 – 14 8 – 13 59. 3 x 17 13 – 18 60.17 – 3 18 – 22 61.14 – 10 42 – 47 62.10 – 4 47 x 29 63. 4 x 27 26 – 31 64.27 – 32Black surrendered. Koeperman – ChmielWhite has a good centre position with a lead in development of +4. His goal is to conquer square 24, launching a right wing attack. White can’t change to 24 immediately because the outpost is attacked and gets lost. So white prepares the 30 – 24 x 24 exchange. 32.45 – 40! 4 – 10?If black plays 4 – 9 white shouldn’t go to 24 yet: 32… 4 – 9 33.30 – 24? 19 x 30 34.35 x 24 14 – 19! 35.40 – 35 19 x 30 36.35 x 24 9 – 14 and back conquers the outpost. At 32… 4 – 9 white strengthens his centre: 33.33 – 28! 8 – 12 34.30 – 24 19 x 30 35.35 x 24 2 – 8! Black wants to be able to change a piece at 23. 36.28 – 23 12 – 18! 37.23 x 12 8 x 17 38.32 – 28 14 – 19 39.40 – 35 19 x 30 40.35 x 24 9 – 14 41.28 – 23! White is just in time to guard his outpost. 41… 13 – 18 42.23 x 12 17 x 8 43.24 – 19 14 x 23 44.29 x 18 with a big advantage for white. If black plays 32… 3 – 9 white should prepare going to 24 by playing 33.32 – 28! because 33.33 – 28? is punished by 19 – 24 30 x 10 9 – 14 10 x 19 13 x 44 B+. 33.30 – 24! 19 x 30 34.35 x 24 21 – 2634…. 14 – 19? wasn’t possible because of 35.29 – 23! 20 x 27 36.23 x 5 W+. 35.32 – 28!Black can’t still attack the outpost: 35… 14 – 19? 36.29 – 23! 20 x 18 37.28 – 22 18 x 27 38.37 – 32 27 x 29 39.34 x 5 and white has a good endgame. 35… 13 – 19 36.24 x 13 8 x 19Black’s dangling piece at 10 looks terrible. Black doesn’t have any active formation. White’s advantage is enormous. 37.43 – 38 3 – 9 38.29 – 23!White doesn’t allow black to play 20 – 24 x 24 and attacks. Now his goal is to get a new outpost at 22. 38… 2 – 8 39.36 – 31 20 – 24 40.31 – 27 9 – 13 41.27 – 22 16 – 21 42.23 – 18 15 – 20 43.18 x 9 14 x 3 44.22 – 18!White surrendered already. The end of the game could have been: 44.. 8 – 13 45.18 x 9 3 x 14 46.40 – 35 10 – 15 At 21 – 27 white doesn’t play 28 – 23 but takes a coup Weiss to 4. 47.34 – 29 21 – 27 48.39 – 34 27 – 31 49.29 – 23 31 x 42 50.38 x 47 26 – 31 51.34 – 29 31 – 37 52.49 – 44 25 – 30 53.44 – 39 +. K. Thijssen – R. ZodroviakWhite has a centre position with active formations. He occupies both central squares 28 and 29 and also strategic square 27. Black’s position is clearly much weaker. He holds a semi-fork but with pieces 10 / 14 this is rarely good. Black also misses a piece at <9>, making the position more vulnerable. Black has little space. He can only play piece 2, if we eliminate the awful 13 – 19 move. White has a difficult choice to make. Not possible is 28 – 23 because of 13 – 19! (32 – 28 16 – 21 27 x 16 18 – 22 etc.) B+. Changing 37 – 31 x 41 gives black extra space, so white should play 34 – 30 or 43 – 39. 37.34 – 30?In his calculation the Dutch grandmaster must have missed the 37… 14 – 19! 38.30 – 25? 26 – 31!! kingshot for black. Strong defender 38 is removed in this combination! Because 37… 14 – 19 38.37 – 31* gives white nothing, he should have considered (in the diagram!) 37.43 – 39! The answer 37… 13 – 19 gives black a weak position with a lack of formations at his right wing. White takes advantage by playing 38.28 – 22 8 – 13 39.34 – 30 for example 12 – 17 40.22 x 11 16 x 7 41.27 – 22! 18 x 27 42.32 x 21 26 x 17 43.29 – 23 19 x 28 44.30 x 8 2 x 13 45.29 – 23 19 x 28 46.33 x 2 W+. We will scrutinize the most logical move after 37.43 – 39: 2 – 7. Since base piece 2 has been played white can change back preparing the 28 – 23! move. With no piece at 2 anymore black can’t attack piece 23 by 13 – 19. 38.37 – 31! 26 x 37 39.32 x 41 12 – 17 39… 7 – 11 40.28 – 23 results in the same position. 39… 13 – 19 40.28 – 23 19 x 28 41.33 x 11 24 x 42 42.41 – 37! 42 x 22 43.11 – 6 leads to a bad endgame for black. 40.28 – 23! 7 – 12 41.41 – 36 Black is lost: 1) 41… 17 – 21 42.27 – 22 18 x 27 43.23 – 19 14 x 23 44.29 x 7 W+ 2) 41 … 17 – 22 42.34 – 30 22 x 31 43.30 x 19 13 x 24 44.36 x 27 8 – 13 45.38 – 32 13 – 19 46.32 – 28 W+ 3) 41 … 13 – 19 42.34 – 30! 19 x 28 43.33 x 2 24 x 42 44.30 – 25 Black can’t go to king now. 12 – 18 45. 2 – 8! And white will win quickly. In the game black didn’t take profit from white’s tactical mistake. 37… 2 – 7? 38.30 x 19 14 x 34 39.40 x 29 20 – 24 40.29 x 20 15 x 24 41.43 – 39Black can’t play 13 – 19 now because of 35 – 30 24 x 35 28 – 23 W+. Black’s best defence is 41… 10 – 14! 42.39 – 34 14 – 19 43.34 – 29 7 – 11 44.29 x 20 19 – 23 45.28 x 19 13 x 15. 41… 7 – 11? 42.45 – 40This time 42… 13 – 19 is punished by 43.28 – 22! 18 – 23 (8 – 13 27 – 21! +) 44.22 – 18! W+. Defending 10 – 14 43.40 – 34 14 – 19 doesn’t work now. 44.34 – 29 11 – 17 45.29 x 20 19 – 23 46.28 x 19 13 x 15 gives white the 37 – 31 kingshot. After 42… 11 – 17 43.40 – 34 black has two possibilities: 1) 43… 17 – 22 44.28 x 17 12 x 21 45.34 – 29! 10 – 15 46.29 x 20 15 x 24 47.39 – 34 18 – 23* 48.27 – 22! 13 – 19 (8 – 12 22 – 17! +) 49.22 – 18! 23 x 12 50.34 – 29 with a winning breakthrough for white. 2) 43… 17 – 21`44.34 – 30 and black has similar problems to the game. As what black plays loses too 41… 7 – 11 turns out to be the decisive mistake. 42… 10 – 15 43.40 – 34 11 – 17 44.34 – 30!White is aiming his arrows at strong defender piece 13! 44… 17 – 22 45.28 x 17 12 x 21 46.30 x 19 13 x 24 is followed by 47.37 – 31! 26 x 28 48.33 x 2 21 x 34 49.2 x 43 +. 44… 17 – 21 45.30 x 19 13 x 24 46.27 – 22 18 x 27 47.28 – 22 27 x 18 48.37 – 31 26 x 28 49.33 x 2White performed a coup Weiss and won the game. M. van Gelderen – Gantwarg 1.32 – 28 19 – 23 2.28 x 19 14 x 23 3.37 – 32 10 – 14 4.41 – 37 14 – 19 5.33 – 28This is a frequently played opening. White has more active options like: 1) 4.34 – 29 23 x 34 5.39 x 30 2) 5.35 – 30 3) 5.32 – 28 23 x 32 6.37 x 28 5… 17 – 22! 6.28 x 17 11 x 22The most active move. 6… 17 – 21 7.31 – 27 gives white an easy classical game (7… 5 – 10 fails due to the arch shot as we learned in part I of this course). 7.31 – 27 22 x 31 8.36 x 27 5 – 10White takes square 27. Black is building a compact position with formations aimed at square 27. 9.39 – 33 10 – 14 10.33 – 28 6 – 11 11.44 – 39 11 – 17 12.39 – 33 1 – 6 13.46 – 41 7 – 11 14.41 – 36 2 – 7White can’t play 15.50 – 44? due to 17 – 22 28 x 17 11 x 31 36 x 27 23 – 29! B+. White’s most natural move is 15.49 – 44. 15.34 – 30 17 – 22 16.28 x 17 11 x 31 17.36 x 27 20 – 25! 18.40 – 34 7 – 11 19.34 – 29 25 x 34 20.29 x 40 12 – 17While white changes back to break the right wing lock black continues to build a formation against 27. 21.47 – 41 17 – 22 22.41 – 36 22 x 31 23.36 x 27It is better to take 37 x 26, keeping a piece at 36 which gives control over 27. 23… 8 – 12 24.49 – 44 12 – 17 25.44 – 39 15 – 20 26.50 – 44 3 – 8 27.40 – 34Piece 27 is attacked again. 27… 17 – 22! 28.34 – 29It’s better to play 37 – 31 first and then 34 – 29 x 30. 28… 23 x 34 29.39 x 30 22 x 31 30.37 x 26 16 – 21! 31.26 x 17 11 x 22Taking centre square 22. Playing 32.32 – 28 22 – 27 33.30 – 24 20 x 29 34.33 x 24 19 x 30 35.35 x 24 is dangerous because of white’s weakened left wing. 32.44 – 39 8 – 12 33.42 – 37 6 – 11 34.32 – 28 12 – 17White played 32 – 28 taking centre square 28 at last. Black provoked this scenario. White’s centre is not so strong and black can surround it. 35.48 – 42 20 – 24 36.45 – 40 4 – 10 37.37 – 31 11 – 16 38.42 – 37?Weakening square 42 40 – 34 gave a better defence. 38… 18 – 23! 39.38 – 32 13 – 18White is chain-locked. 40.39 – 34 9 – 13White’s position is a mess. 41.31 – 26 is punished by 22 – 27 42.32 x 12 23 x 41 43.12 x 23 19 x 48 30 x 8 44.48 x 2 +. 41.33 – 29 24 x 33 42.28 x 39 can be met by 23 – 29 +. 41.43 – 39 10 – 15 42.31 – 26 24 – 29! 43.33 x 24 22 x 44 44.40 x 49 14 – 20 45.49 – 43 20 x 40 46.35 x 44 15 – 20 47.30 – 25 23 – 28! 48.25 x 21 16 x 40 49.26 – 21 40 – 44 50.21 – 17 28 – 32 51.37 x 28 44 – 50 Exercise 1.1 – 1.4 What would you play in the next four positions? White is to play.1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.The power blockThe power block consists of pieces 25 / 30 / 34 / 35 / 40 / 45. With the power block you can put pressure on <24>. Tsjizjow - BerςotBlack to move White has built the power block putting pressure on piece 24. 27… 6 – 11The same position emerged in the game Tj. Goedemoed – H. Dijkstra 1997 in which 27… 8 – 12 was played. 28.34 – 29 23 x 34 29.40 x 20 15 x 24 30.27 – 22 18 x 27 31.37 – 31! 26 x 37 32.42 x 22 then gave white a huge advantage (12 – 18 is met by 28 – 23 W+). 28.34 – 29 23 x 34 29.40 x 20 15 x 24 30.27 – 22 18 x 27 31.45 – 40An important idea to remember when playing with the power block. White sacrifices 27 – 22 in order to be able to attack piece 24 again. Of course black can’t play 13 – 18. 31… 27 – 31 32.36 x 27 13 – 18 33.28 – 23! 19 x 39 34.30 x 10 18 – 22 35.27 x 18 9 – 13 36.18 x 9 3 x 5 37.40 – 34 39 x 30 38.35 x 24A strong attack for white at the right wing remains. Black can’t stop a future breakthrough. 38… 8 – 13 39.25 – 20 21 – 27 40.32 x 21 16 x 27 41.38 – 33Neutralizing the 27 – 31 attempt to break through. 41… 11 – 17 42.20 – 14 2 – 8 43.42 – 38 17 – 21 44.48 – 43 27 – 31 45.24 – 19 31 x 42 46.38 x 47 13 x 24 47.14 - 9 8 – 13 48. 9 x 18 26 – 31 49.18 – 12 31 – 37 50.12 – 7 24 – 30 51.43 – 39 5 – 10 52. 7 – 2White won after 52… 30 – 35 53.39 – 34 10 – 14 54.34 – 30 35 x 24 55. 2 x 30 21 – 26 56.30 – 48 W+. Goedemoed – WinsemiusThis position (2003) was also reached in Goedemoed – Klein 1997. The opened <2> gives white the possibility to blow up the position. Huisman had already shown this winning plan against Navarro during the world championships in 1956. 29.34 – 29 23 x 34 30.40 x 20 15 x 24 31.28 – 23 19 x 39 32.30 x 10Black can’t play 39 – 44 because of 37 – 31! 26 x 28 10 – 5 21 x 43 5 x 40 W+. 32… 9 – 14 33.10 x 19 13 x 24 34.37 – 31 26 x 28 35.38 – 33 21 x 32 36.33 x 2 39 – 44 37. 2 x 30 44 – 50White can’t play 30 – 19? 27 – 32 B+. Black gets the main diagonal in possession, but white can build a catching construction, chasing black’s king away. 38.42 – 37 32 x 41 39.36 x 47 50 – 28 40.30 – 13!Black’s pieces can’t get active since white possesses the 4 / 36 diagonal. 40… 12 – 17 41.35 – 30 16 – 21 42.45 – 40 6 – 11 43.40 – 35 21 – 26 44.30 – 24 17 – 21 45.13 – 36 28 – 37White is building a catching construction for the black king. 46.25 – 20 11 – 16 47.20 – 15 3 – 8 48.48 – 43 8 – 12 49.43 – 38Black resigned. B. Zwart – G. Jansen 22.47 – 42? 14 – 20!Before building the power block black activates the 15 / 20 / 24 tail aimed at <29>. 23.30 – 25 9 – 14 24.40 – 34 12 – 17In spite of the inactive piece at 5 black has a great position because of the overwhelming pressure at <27>. 25.34 – 29 23 x 34 26.39 x 30 is answered by 17 – 22 28 x 17 11 x 31 24 – 29 33 x 24 20 x 29 45 – 40 6 – 11 43 – 39 11 – 17 and only the poor 27 – 22 18 x 27 39 – 33 remains for white. 25.34 – 30 17 – 22 26.28 x 17 11 x 31 27.36 x 27 24 – 29 28.33 x 24 20 x 29After 29.39 – 33 black sacrifices the piece attacking <27> by 6 – 11 – 17. 29.39 – 34 29 x 40 30.45 x 34 6 – 1131.38 – 33 is met by 23 – 28 32 x 12 21 x 41, so piece 27 is lost. White resigned. Knowing black’s plan it isn’t hard to understand why white had to play 22.48 – 42! His left wing is protected against an attack. Black has to play 12 – 17 and 17 – 22 at some moment after which white’s left wing is developed and he reaches a good classical position. T. van Adrichem - GoedemoedThe black-player studied the plan of G. Jansen with the power block the day before this game was played. 17 – 22 28 x 17 11 x 31 36 x 26 6 – 11 33 – 28 will not yield any positive result. So black has to eliminate piece 33 first. 23… 17 – 22 24.28 x 17 11 x 31 25.36 x 27 24 – 29 26.33 x 24 19 x 30The problem for white is that 27.38 – 33 23 – 28 28.32 x 12 21 x 41 results in a bad endgame for white. Piece 5 is suddenly active in constructions catching the king! The best move for white is 29.42 – 37 41 x 32 30.12 – 7 30 – 35! and white can’t go to king and white can’t go to king. In the game white played 27.34 – 29? 23 x 34 28.40 x 29 30 – 35 29.38 – 33 and after 18 – 23 30.29 x 18 13 x 31 black won a piece and the game. Salomé – Coenegracht 28.42 – 38With this move white weakens his left flank. White could also have played 43 – 38. In the game black will put pressure on white’s left wing by building the power block. But white still has enough defence left. 28… 12 – 17 29.47 – 42 8 – 12 30.41 – 36 21 – 26 31.49 – 44 17 – 21White should have played 32.44 – 39 12 – 17 1) 33.28 – 22? 17 x 28 34.33 x 22 23 – 29! 35.39 – 33 18 – 23 36.33 – 28 3 – 8 and the necessary 37.43 – 39 is met by a coup Philippe 11 – 17 22 x 11 16 x 7 27 x 16 7 – 11 16 x 7 8 – 12 7 x 18 13 x 44 B+. 2) 33.39 – 34? 17 – 22 34.28 x 17 11 x 31 35.36 x 27 23 – 28! 36.32 x 12 21 x 41 37.42 – 37 41 x 32 38.38 x 27 14 – 20 39.25 x 23 13 – 18 40.30 x 19 18 x 49 with a bad endgame for white. 3) 33.27 – 22! 18 x 27 34.37 – 31 26 x 37 35.42 x 22 and now 21 – 26 can be strongly met by 36.22 – 18! 13 x 22 36… 23 x 12 37.28 – 23 19 x 37 38.30 x 10 gives white a better endgame. 37.36 – 31 26 x 37 38.32 x 41 23 x 32 39.38 x 18 with serious advantage for white. 32.43 – 39? 12 – 17 33.48 – 43 33… 17 – 22 34.28 x 17 11 x 31 35.36 x 27 23 – 29!Threatening to go to <34>, so white’s reply is forced. 36.44 – 40 18 – 2236… 6 – 11 37.33 – 28 18 – 23 had also been a very strong reaction. 37.27 x 18 13 x 22 38.32 – 28Only playing 38.25 – 20 14 x 45 39.35 – 30 24 x 35 40.33 x 4 45 – 50 41.4 x 36 50 x 11 42.38 – 33 11 x 48 43.42 – 38 48 x 31 44.36 x 18 white could keep on fighting. 38… 21 – 27 39.28 x 17 26 – 31 40.37 x 26 27 – 32 41.38 x 27 29 x 47And black won. Kolesnik – GantwargBlack has a huge weakness: the dangling piece at 9. White proved that the power block isn’t dangerous at all in this situation. 36.27 – 22 18 x 27 37.37 – 31 26 x 37 38.42 x 22 21 – 26 39.48 – 42!Black has no good response at the 22 – 18 threat. 39… 24 – 29 40.42 – 37 17 – 21 41.40 – 34 29 x 40 42.45 x 34 and black has no good move left (check this yourself!). 39… 17 – 21 40.22 – 18 13 x 33 41.38 x 20Black can’t play 21 – 27 x 27 now because of 36 – 31! +. White won after 41… 23 – 28 42.32 x 23 19 x 28 43.20 – 15 21 – 27 44.25 – 20 14 x 25 45.15 – 10 11 – 17 46.35 – 30 25 x 34 47.40 x 29 17 – 22 48.29 – 24 28 – 33 49.24 – 19 6 – 11 50.10 – 5 22 – 28 51.42 – 38 33 x 42 52.19 – 14 9 x 20 53.5 x 48 and black resigned. Wesselink – DerkxIt looks like white can force a win. 37.34 – 29 23 x 34 38.40 x 20 15 x 24 39.28 – 23 19 x 39 40.30 x 17 21 x 12 41.45 – 40 18 – 23 42.35 – 30!Threatening 40 – 34 39 – 44 34 – 29 23 x 34 30 x 50 +. Black didn’t find the possible defence and lost. Ex 2.1 What should black have played? Ex 2.2 White forces a nice shot! Tsjizjow – Skliarow Ex 2.3 White can perform a very strong plan putting pressure on black’s left wing. Can you find the plan? A. van Berkel – Wesselink Ex 2.4 How did white play to neutralize the power block? Ex 2.5 Can black take a winning king shot after 41 – 36? R. van der Pal – H. Vermeulen Ex 2.6 White performed a king shot!Persian draught players 3.The strong piece at <21>Usually it is not advisable to go to 21 if you have a piece at 27. 27 – 21? 16 x 27 32 x 21 has two disadvantages:
White has a strong centre, but also a weakness at 36. Allowing black to play 17 – 22 28 x 17 12 x 21 leaves piece 36 inactive. White’s next move, putting a piece on <21>, gives piece 36 space to play again. Moreover, piece 21 is annoying for black, both for positional and tactical reasons. 37.27 – 21 16 x 27 38.32 x 21 8 – 13The best defence is 38… 14 – 19 39.34 – 29 9 – 13 40.29 x 20 19 – 23 41.28 x 19 13 x 15. 39.48 – 43 13 – 1939… 18 – 22 fails due to 37 – 31 26 x 37 43 – 39 17 x 26 28 x 10 W+. 39… 6 – 11 40.36 – 31 11 – 16? 41.31 – 27 is also losing: 41… 14 – 20 42.34 – 30 24 x 35 43.28 – 23 18 x 29 44.33 x 15 9 – 14 45.38 – 33 13 – 18 46.33 – 28 and black is frozen out. You can see that the pieces at <21> & <27> keep three black pieces busy. Black has a huge weakness at <13>. Ex 3.1 How can white exploit the weakness forcing a win? Give the first three moves. J. v.d. Borst – P. Tuik 35.27 – 21 16 x 27 36.32 x 21 18 – 2236…9 – 14 37.40 – 35 White can’t take the 28 – 22 37 – 31 33 x 2 kingshot because the king is caught by 13 – 19 losing a piece. 37… 14 – 19 is met by the shot 28 – 22 18 x 16 37 – 31 38 – 32 33 x 2 W+. Now white points his arrows at <12>. 37.28 – 23 13 – 18 38.36 – 31 18 x 29 39.34 x 23 7 – 11Black comes up with the best defence. 39… 9 – 14 loses after 40.40 – 34! 7 – 11 At 14 – 20 34 – 29! is played with the lethal threat of 23 – 18 W+. 41.23 – 18!! 22 x 13 42.21 – 26 13 – 18 43.16 x 7 12 x 1 44.37 – 32 26 x 28 45.33 x 2 W+. 40.21 – 16 22 – 27 41.16 x 18 27 x 3642.18 – 12 8 – 13 43.12 x 21 26 x 17 44.33 – 28 17 – 21 45.38 – 33 21 – 26 46.23 – 18 13 x 22 47.28 x 17 26 – 31 48.37 x 26 36 – 41 49.17 – 11 41 – 46 50.11 – 7 46 – 32 51.40 – 35 32 x 49 52.7 – 1 49 – 32? Black could have forced a draw playing 52… 24 – 30 53.35 x 24 49 – 35 etc. White could have won playing 53.33 – 29! 24 x 44 54.35 – 30 25 x 34 55.1 x 4 W+. Mitsjanski – Tsjizjow 34.27 – 22 18 x 27 35.32 x 21 23 x 32 36.38 x 27 11 – 16The lock isn’t economic at all. Five pieces are locking only pieces 21 & 27… 37.39 – 33 20 – 25 38.43 – 39 13 – 18?Black should have taken the centre playing 38… 19 – 23 39.33 – 29 13 – 18 40.39 – 33 8 – 13 41.33 – 28 23 x 32 42.37 x 28 26 – 31 43.27 x 36 16 x 27 =. 39.33 – 28!Black’s space to play is reduced seriously, while white has taken control over <24>. After 39… 8 – 13 40.30 – 24 19 x 30 41.35 x 24 3 – 9 42.39 – 33 9 – 14 43.24 – 20! 6 – 11 44.20 x 9 13 x 4 45.33 – 29 black is frozen out completely. 39… 17 – 22 40.28 x 17 8 – 13 41.17 x 8 3 x 12 42.30 – 24 19 x 30 43.35 x 24 26 x 17 44.34 – 29White takes control over <24> and <27>. 44… 17 – 22 is met by 45.29 – 23! W+. 44…. 6 – 11 45.39 – 34 17 – 22 46.37 – 31 11 – 17 47.42 – 37!Black has forced moves and will be frozen out. 47… 22 – 28 48.31 – 26 17 – 22 49.37 – 31 12 – 17 50.41 – 36White won after 50… 13 – 19 51.24 x 13 18 x 9 52.27 x 18 16 – 21 53.29 – 24 28 – 33 54.24 – 19 33 – 38 55.19 – 13 9 – 14 56.13 – 8 38 – 42 57.34 – 30! 25 x 34 58.8 – 3 W+. Tsjizjow - SchwarzmanIn this position, we again see some pressure on <24>. However, it is not entirely clear how white should profit. Tsjizjow however shows us what he is made of, and calculates that conquering <21> gives him the best prospects. 24.31 – 27! 11 – 16*A forced move: at 24... 1 – 7? white manages to make a quick win: 25.27 – 21!! 18 – 23 (what else?) 26.32 – 28! 23 x 32 27.37 x 28 and the threat 28 – 23 can’t be met. 25.27 – 21!!Tsjizjow causes big trouble for the current World Champion with this move, which is considered as passive in millions of other situations. However, here the circumstances are perfect: black has little space left due to all kinds of tactics. 25... 16 x 27 26.32 x 21 1 – 7?This already is the losing move. Black could still have fled via 26... 6 – 11 27.33 – 28! 24 – 29 (clearly the best move, as the following three variations show: 1) 27... 11 – 16? 28.43 – 39 16 x 27 29.37 – 31 26x37 30.42 x 11 18 – 23 31.38 – 33 23 x 32 32.41 – 37 32 x 41 33.46 x 37 and white is obviously better. 2) 27... 18 – 23?? 28.21 – 16! 23 x 32 29.16 x 18 13 x 22 30.38 x 18 W+. 3) 27... 1 – 6?? 28.21 – 16! and black has zugzwang: he must make a move, but each one would worsen his position.) 28.28 – 23 19 x 28 29.37 – 31 26 x 37 30.41 x 34 17 x 26 and black awaits a long defence of his severely weakened left wing. 26... 18 – 23 would not really improve the situation, since after 27.33 – 28! 23 x 32 28.37 x 28 black is forced to play to the graveyard, since 28... 13 – 18 fails due to 36 – 31!, 41 x 32 and 28 – 23 with a breakthrough. 27.43 – 39 18 – 23The alternation 27... 6 – 11? is met by a nice kingshot: 28.39 – 34! 18 – 23 (what else?) 29.33 – 29! 24 x 33 30.38 x 18 13 x 22 31.30 – 24 19 x 39 32.48 – 43 39 x 48 33.42 – 38 48 x 31 34.36 x 18 12 x 23 35.21 x 1 W+ 28.36 – 31!!While Schwarzman seems to have managed to get hold of a strong position when we analyze it at surface level, big trouble is lurking underneath. Again, his next move is forced due to the 37 – 32 threat. The reply 28... 7 – 11 would be answered by 29.21 – 16 and 29... 13 – 18 then of course is no relief. 28... 6 – 11 29.41 – 36 23 – 29!The best defence, because after 29... 14 – 20? 30.25 x 14 9 x 20 31.30 – 25!! black is again in zugzwang, check this for yourself! 30.33 – 28! 29 – 34 31.39 – 33! 13 – 18It looks like black can save his piece by playing 31... 34 – 40 32.35 x 44 24 x 35, but then he is frozen out magnificently: 33.33 – 29! 13 – 18 34.38 – 33 8 – 13 (at 18 – 22 always 29 – 23!) 35.42 – 38 3 – 8 36.48 – 43 and black has no sensible moves left! 32.30 x 39 18 – 23 33.38 – 32And Tsjizjow was able to win this brilliant game, albeit with some complications later on, because black does have some compensation for his lost piece. (The Tsjizjow – Schwarzman game was covered by Martijn van der Klis.) 4.The left wing attack Tsjizjow – SwizinskiWhite built a strong centre position containing lots of formations. He built his right wing playing the central 45 – 40 instead of 44 – 40. This means he can’t use the Olympic formation anymore to push 24 away. White wants to get more space at the left wing. That’s why he changes to <21>. 26.27 – 21 16 x 27 27.32 x 21 10 – 15 28.21 – 26 24 – 30 29.16 x 7 12 x 1 30.37 – 32 2 – 7 31.31 – 27 30 – 35White will attack again at black’s right wing. 32.27 – 22 18 x 27 33.32 x 21 20 – 24 34.36 – 31 8 – 12One would expect black to play 24 – 30 with an arrow-lock. White has great compensation having control over the centre. Piece 15 is not active in the lock. With his next move white eliminates the possibility to be locked. 35.34 – 29 13 – 18 36.29 x 20 15 x 24 37.40 – 34 9 – 13Black, a gifted and well-known composer, was hoping for 38.31 – 27? 18 – 23! Now: 1) 39.38 – 32? 23 – 29 40.34 x 14 13 – 19 41.14 x 23 12 – 17 42.21 x 12 7 x 40 B+ 2) 39.27 – 22? 23 x 32 40.38 x 27 24 – 29 41.34 x 14 13 – 18 42.22 x 13 35 – 40 43.44 x 35 25 – 30 44.35 x 24 12 – 17 45.21 x 12 7 x 47 B+ 3) 39.28 – 22 24 – 29 40.33 x 24 19 x 30 with advantage for black. White however launches an attack at <17>. 38.21 – 17 12 x 21 39.26 x 17 18 – 23?A more modest reply like 7 – 12 17 x 8 3 x 12 was needed. 40.34 – 30! 23 x 32 41.38 x 27 25 x 34 42.39 x 30The trapped piece 30 (in between 24 and 35) implies tactical merits like 42… 13 – 18? 43.33 – 29 24 x 33 44.17 – 12 35 x 24 45.12 x 14 W+ or 42… 3 – 9 43.31 – 26 9 – 14? 44.33 – 29 24 x 33 45.43 – 38 35 x 24 46.38 x 18 W+. After black eliminates piece <17> white again attacks at the left wing. 42… 7 – 12 43.17 x 8 13 x 2 44.27 – 22 1 – 7 45.31 – 27 6 – 11 46.33 – 29! 24 x 33 47.43 – 38 35 x 24 48.38 x 20 3 – 9 49.27 – 21White is attacking at both wings. Black can’t escape anymore. 49… 7 – 12 50.21 – 16 12 – 17 51.16 x 7 2 x 11 52.20 – 15 11 x 22 53.15 – 10White won after 53… 9 – 14 54.10 – 4 19 – 24 55.4 – 13 14 – 19 56.13 – 2 11 – 17 57.44 – 39 17 – 22 58.39 – 34 19 – 23 59.2 x 30 28 – 33 60.30 – 25 and black resigned. Coenegracht – KoopsWhite is starting a strong attack at the left wing. 38.27 – 21 18 – 2338… 6 – 11 39.21 – 16 leaves black with no good move: 1) 39… 11 – 17 is followed by a kingshot (look yourself!) 2) 39… 18 – 23 is followed by a breakthrough (check that yourself!) 3) 39… 12 – 17 40.32 – 27 8 – 12 is punished by 41.28 – 23! 19 x 28* 42.33 x 22 17 x 28 43.34 – 30 25 x 34 44.39 x 6 W+. 4) After 39… 9 – 14 40.34 – 30! 25 x 34 41.40 x 29 black is frozen out. 39.28 – 22 24 – 30 40.35 x 24 20 x 29 41.33 x 24 19 x 30 42.34 – 29 23 x 34 43.40 x 29 9 – 14 44.38 – 33 14 – 19 45.32 – 28White has gained space. Black can’t play 12 – 18 because of the kingshot 21 – 17 26 – 21 17 – 11 28 – 23 33 x 2 W+. 45… 19 – 24 46.29 x 20 15 x 2446… 25 x 14 gives a longer defence, but will also lose. White immediately goes on to take <23> in his possession. The 21 / 22 / 23 front is very strong. 47.28 – 23 30 – 35 48.45 – 40 35 x 44 49.39 x 50 25 – 30 50.43 – 39 30 – 35 51.50 – 44Black resigned at the right moment. Baba Sy – SijbrandsBlack shows that an attack at white’s right wing can be very dangerous. The aim of this minority attack is not breaking through but freezing out the opponent by limiting his space. 42… 23 – 29!From a psychological point of view it is hard to play 43.39 – 34 19 – 23 44.28 x 30 13 – 18 45.34 x 23 25 x 45 46.23 – 19 although it’s a draw after 46… 45 – 50 47.19 – 13 =. 43.39 – 33 25 – 30 44.40 – 35?Giving black too much space is a lethal mistake. White should have fixed pieces 29 and 30 by playing 43 – 39. 44… 12 – 18 45.36 – 31 8 – 12 46.31 – 26Better would have been 46.28 – 22. Now black forces a win. 46… 29 – 34!After 47.43 – 39 34 x 43 48.38 x 49 30 – 34 49.44 – 39 34 x 43 50.49 x 38 11 – 17 51.27 – 22 51.27 – 21 is met by 18 – 22 with the decisive 24 – 29 threat. 51… 18 x 27 52.32 x 21 6 – 11 53.38 – 32 53.21 – 16 13 – 18 54.16 x 7 12 x 1 55.38 – 32 18 – 23 B+ 53… 11 – 16 54.32 – 27 13 – 18 55.27 – 22 18 x 27 56.21 x 32 12 – 18 57.32 – 27 18 – 23 is winning for black. 47.44 – 39 11 – 17 48.27 – 22 etc. will lead to the game. At 48.27 – 21 18 – 22 follows threatening 24 – 29 B+. 47.27 – 22 18 x 27 48.32 x 21 11 – 1748… 34 – 40 is wrong because of 43 – 39! 40 x 49 21 – 16 49 x 23 16 x 20 W+. 49.44 – 39 13 – 18White is lost. 50.21 – 16 6 – 11 51.16 x 7 12 x 1 52.38 – 32 18 – 23 53.43 – 38 34 x 43 44.38 x 49 30 – 34 leads to a quick freeze out for white. --------------------------------- | |
Просмотров: 903 | |
Всего комментариев: 0 | |
[14 Май 2024] | [Шашки] |
Минговс - Масс XXXVI чемп. Латвии (пер) 2000 Разветвление I: 7.fg5 h:f4 8.e:g5 c:e3 9.f:d4 (0) |
[20 Авг 2014] | [Шашки] |
CheckerBoard 1.721 (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Kasparov - Karpov WC 1990] |
Kasparov Garry - Karpov Anatoly World Championship Lyon (14), 1990 (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Шахматы] |
Euwe - Reti m Amsterdam (3), 1920 (Kasparov,Garry) (0) |
[11 Май 2024] | [Kasparov - Karpov WC 1990] |
Каспаров - Карпов Матч 1990, Нью-Йорк (0) |
[18 Май 2024] | [Kasparov - Karpov WC 1990] |
Kasparov, Garry - Karpov, Anatoly World Championship 1990 (0) |
[27 Окт 2014] | [Шахматы] |
Урок № 14 (0) |
[13 Май 2024] | [Шашки] |
Бойчук В. - Панченко А.А. 27 п-во Украины(пер)1999 Нюанс I: 13.bc3! (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Шашки] |
Кустарёв Ю. - Симонян Б. XXVIII чемпионат СССР Баку 1968 Возможность II: 15...hg7 (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Шашки] |
Никифоров - Цыганов Чемпионат России Адлер 2003 9 тур Возможность II:План II: 13...hg7 (0) |
[01 Дек 2024] | [Ding Liren - Gukesh D FIDE WCCM 2024] |
Ding,Liren (2728) - Gukesh D (2783) [A45] FIDE World Championship Match 2024 Singapore SGP (6), 01.12.2024 (0) |
[01 Дек 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Via Roozenburg en Bonnard tot remise (0) |
[30 Ноя 2024] | [Ding Liren - Gukesh D FIDE WCCM 2024] |
Gukesh D (2783) - Ding,Liren (2728) [C01] FIDE World Championship Match 2024 Singapore SGP (5), 30.11.2024 (0) |
[29 Ноя 2024] | [Ding Liren - Gukesh D FIDE WCCM 2024] |
Ding,Liren (2728) - Gukesh D (2783) FIDE World Championship Match 2024 Singapore SGP (4), 29.11.2024 (0) |
[28 Ноя 2024] | [Ding Liren - Gukesh D FIDE WCCM 2024] |
Gukesh D (2783) - Ding,Liren (2728) [D02] FIDE World Championship Match 2024 Singapore SGP (3), 27.11.2024 (0) |
[27 Ноя 2024] | [Ding Liren - Gukesh D FIDE WCCM 2024] |
Ding,Liren (2728) - Gukesh D (2783) [C50] FIDE World Championship Match 2024 Singapore SGP (2), 26.11.2024 (0) |
[27 Ноя 2024] | [Ding Liren - Gukesh D FIDE WCCM 2024] |
Gukesh D (2783) - Ding,Liren (2728) WCC Match 2024 Singapore (1.1), 25.11.2024 (0) |
[27 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Levensgevaarlijk maar speelbaar (0) |
[26 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Adequaat tegenspel tot de eindfase (0) |
[25 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Twee moeizame winstpartijen (0) |
[23 Ноя 2024] | [Checkers-100] |
Ton Sijbrands - Wlm Terlouw (Blindsimultaan Lutten 2002) (0) |
[23 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Van Marle kent ook zijn klassiekers (0) |
[22 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Explosief flankduel met veel rekenwerk (0) |
[21 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
De strategisch beste prestaties (0) |
[20 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Уникальный опыт, полученный благодаря многочисленным жертвам (0) |
Аркады и экшн [67] | Настольные [7] |
Головоломки [115] | Слова [2] |
Поиск предметов [68] | Стратегии [15] |
Многопользовательские [21] | Другие [4] |
И тогда красные постреляли всех благородных басмачей.(Рыбников Ю.А.) | Красивый термин. Великий термин!(Рыбников Ю.А.) |
Как умер первый материалист Европы? От обжорства! Логика такая — раз души нет, давайте есть побольше.(Рыбников Ю.А.) | На этой фотографии ваш покорный слуга говорит о романтизме и неоромантизме.(Рыбников Ю.А.) |
Чьи законы изучают физика, математика? Конечно, бога.(Рыбников Ю.А.) | Моя лекция по культуре Ренессанса… я долго трудился, чтобы придать ей антикварный вид.(Рыбников Ю.А.) |
Счастье — это напиться. Лимонада! (Рыбников Ю.А.) | Считать, что человек — это животное, значит оправдывать каннибализм.(Рыбников Ю.А.) |
Все эти серийные маньяки, они вменяемы!(Рыбников Ю.А.) | Не готовы к контрольной ― готовьтесь к Красной армии! (Политюков В.П.) |
Не ты управляешь привычкой, а привычка управляет тобой. Это зомбирование. (Политюков В.П.) | Видите эту кошку (извиняюсь, я сейчас не могу сюда принести живую кошку). Какой смысл этой кошки?(Рыбников Ю.А.) |
Ямок без трения не бывает. Кроме одной… ямки без трения есть! (Политюков В.П.) | Вот, девушка, вам нравятся белогвардейские офицеры? (Рыбников Ю.А.) |
— Правильно! Вот вам зачёт будет! Только не так, как вы сказали, а «гомосексуалисты»!(Рыбников Ю.А.) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Многопользовательские] |
Hellbreed (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Стратегии] |
Youda Фермер (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Аркады и экшн] |
Планета битвы (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Головоломки] |
Скрытые чудеса глубин (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Аркады и экшн] |
Веселая ферма 3. Ледниковый период (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Поиск предметов] |
Департамент особых расследований (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Поиск предметов] |
Эхо печали (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Поиск предметов] |
Затерянные жемчужины Таити (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Головоломки] |
Сокровища Монтесумы 2 (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Поиск предметов] |
Под покровом ночи. Остров безумия (0) |
[09 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Исаенко С. - Парамонов В. ВПФ-24, 2001 Московская система Возможность II: 7.dc3 (0) |
[08 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Литвинович В. - Симонян Б. XXV чемпионат СССР, 4.11.1965 Вариант I: 5.gf4 (0) |
[07 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Криворученко П.Д. - Кузнецов В.Н. XXXI чемп.России(пер), 1998 План I: 8.cb4? (0) |
[07 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Циркин - Кетлер F-10 X-Ч.СССР(пер), 1974 Московская система Разветвление I: 6...ba5 (0) |
[06 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Стручков Н. - Андреев Д. МАГ (классика), 1999 Московская система Ответ II: 14.cd4 (0) |
[06 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Высоцкий В. - Далимов В. Заочная встреча, 2004 Московская система План II: 12.ba5 (0) |
[05 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Высоцкий В. - Далимов В.Заочная встреча, 2004 Московская система План I: 12.ba3 (0) |
[05 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Тарохин В. - Росляков Г. РКГ-22d Ком.ч.России(пер) 2002 Московская система (0) |
[05 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Дрозд Н. - Дубянский Н. LXVI чемпионат Москвы, 1998 Система III: 3...gf6 4.b:d6 e:c5. (0) |
[04 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Скрабов В. - Валюк А. МАРШ-1995,1995 Московская система I.cd4 dc5 2.bc3 fg5 3.cb4 (0) |
[02 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Коган М. - Куперман И. Матч IX-Чемр.СССР-1947, 1947, Московская система (0) |
[02 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Султанов Р.Р. - Клевицкий Э.Д. ПОБЕДА-55, 2000 Система II Продолжение II: 6.ed2 (0) |
[01 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Симонян Б. - Вертинский Л. XXVI чемпионат СССР, Грозный,1966 Вариант II: 5...dc7 (0) |
[01 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Соков В. - Торчинский Г. 1938 Система II Вариант I: 5...ba5 Продолжение II: 6.cd2 (0) |
[19 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Петров В. - Лебедев Ю. XXXIII чемпионат СССР, 1973 Система II. Вариант I: 5...ba5 (0) |
[18 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Мардер Л. - Сретенский Н.1956 Московский вариант (0) |
[18 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Корхов С. - Хейф Л. XI чемпионат СССР Москва 1949 Московский вариант (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Владыкин Г. - Блиндер Б. Продолжение III: 5...hg7 (0) |
[10 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Фазылов М. - Кандауров А. Звезды Самарканда 1982 (0) |
[23 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Ниедритис А. - Шафир В.МЧ-6/еПФ, 2002 Разветвление II: 7.hg3 (0) |
[23 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Цирик З. - Хейф Л. XIII чемпионат СССР, Харьков, 1951 (0) |
[22 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Попик И. - Савенок А. МАГ-92 (совр), 1992 Разветвление II: 7.hg3 (0) |
[21 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Азаров А - Мартынов И. МАРШ-1994, I.cd4 dc5. 2.bc3 fg5 3.cb4 gf6 4.b:d6 e:c5 5.gh4 fe5 (0) |
[21 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Мурсалов Э. - Плакхин А. Чемпионат ВЦСПС, 1979 Московский вариант (0) |
[20 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Абдуллаев У. - Доска И.Чемпионат ВЦСПС, 1976 Московский вариант (0) |
[20 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Куперман И. - Кравцов Н.1952 Московский вариант Вариант II: 5.gh4 (0) |
[19 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Хечумов Г. - Цирик З. XVIII чемпионат СССР, 1957 Московский вариант (0) |
[29 Июн 2017] | [Городская партия-2] |
Пуусепп Оскар-104 - 05-07 1983 Городская партия с 3. ...gh4 Изолированные шашки (0) |
[28 Июн 2017] | [Городская партия-2] |
Пуусепп Оскар-433-25-55 1983 Городская партия с 3. ...gh4 Сложные комбинации (0) |
[28 Июн 2017] | [Городская партия-2] |
Пуусепп Оскар-359-16-37 1983 Городская партия с 3. ...gh4 Принудительное удаление (0) |
[17 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Туманишвили - Пеепс ВКР-3 Ком.П-воСССР(пер), 1969 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[17 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Блиндер С. - Миротин Б. X чемпионат СССР, Рига 1947 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Веверис - Мартинсон Ком.Чемп.Латвии, 1991 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Соколовский М. - Ильяшенко А. XXX чемпионат Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Смаченко В. - Пустовит А. ФЗП-2 Золотое перо 1996 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[13 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Рамм Л. - Хейф Л. 10-Чемп.СССР п-ф, 1947 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[13 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Плакхин А. - Каспаров Ю. Чемпионат ВЦСПС Одесса 1974 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[12 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
А. Савин - А. Потапов, 2005 г., по переписке Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[12 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Шутилкин Н. - Коршунов Д. X чемпионат СССР 1947 Разветвление II: 8.ab2 (0) |
[11 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Зелтинс - Рутиньш XXXIV чемп.Латвии(пер),1998 (0) |
[11 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Еськов С. - Шогин Д. Ч-т России, Адлер 2006 1 тур Разветвление I: 8.dc5 (0) |
[11 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Мартынов А. - Созинов А. Ч-т России Адллер 2005 муж. Разветвление I: 8.dc5 (0) |
[10 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Павлов С. - Савенок А. Мемориал В.Сокова, 2002 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[09 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Мельников В. - Марцинюк Е.О.МО-30а, 1997 Разветвление II: 11.de5 (0) |
[09 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Ремесис А. - Старобинский М.F9 IX-Ч.СССР(пер)-1973 Разветвление I: 11.hg3 (0) |
[02 Дек 2018] | [шашки-100] |
Golubeva pēc zaudējuma titulcīņā, visticamāk, noslēgs zvaigžņoto karjeru (0) |
[19 Мар 2016] | [Dambrete] |
Арустамов Ю. - Миловидов П. XXXIV чемпионат СССР 1979 Кол (0) |
[06 Авг 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete Individuālais atklātņu repertuārs - «SMUĻJANA SPĒLE» (0) |
[01 Авг 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete Individuālais atklātņu repertuārs - «KUKUJEVA GAMBITS» (0) |
[21 Мар 2016] | [Dambrete] |
Кандауров А. - Абациев Н. Чемпионат СССР 1978 Двойной кол (0) |
[20 Мар 2016] | [Dambrete] |
Кузюков Ю. - Мурсалов Э. ЦС ДСО Буревестник 1975 Безымянное начало (0) |
[10 Дек 2021] | [Dambrete] |
Две дамки и простая против дамки и простой Способ проведения простой «c1» в дамки (0) |
[03 Авг 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete Individuālais atklātņu repertuārs «APGRIEZTĀ DŪRE AR 1. c3-d4» (0) |
[20 Мар 2016] | [Dambrete] |
Доска И. - Литвинович В. Кубок СССР 1979 Ворошиловград Отказанная обратная городская партия (0) |
[20 Июл 2018] | [Dambrete] |
Individuālā atklātņu repertuāra veidošanas problēmas - Jaunā atklātne (0) |
[22 Июл 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete Individuālais atklātņu repertuārs PARTIJA NR.9 «Atsite uz priekšu» (0) |
[20 Фев 2016] | [Dambrete] |
Сафаров Д. - Литвинович В. - Киевский кол Огни Памира-79 Душамбе (0) |
[18 Мар 2016] | [Dambrete] |
Старобинский М. - Мельников Н. Х-й-Чемп.СССР (пер.), 1975 Игра Бодянского (0) |
[07 Авг 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete Individuālais atklātņu repertuārs - «RETĀ ATKLĀTNE» (0) |
[22 Июл 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete Individuālais atklātņu repertuārs - «Atsite uz priekšu» (0) |
[13 Июн 2021] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Гроссмейстер с мировым именем рассказал, зачем ходит в тренажерку (0) |
[13 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Г. Нарчук - Б. Кузнецов Вилочка Уроки 11,12 и 13 стр.115-116 Чемпионат ВС СССР, 1977 г (0) |
[13 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Игрa Филиппова-Блиндера Жертва Шмульяна-Маркачёва Г. Хацкевич, 25 уроков шашечной игры (0) |
[10 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(249) Игра С. Дьячкова Уроки 9 и 10 - $1.Позиции со связкой правого фланга стр.102 (0) |
[10 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
M. Бурковский - Б.Берлинков Игра Бодянского 25 уроков шашечной игры Г. Хацкевич, 1979 (0) |
[09 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
M. Фазылов - Ю. Арустамов № 7. Игра Каулена Уроки 23,24 и 25 - стр.214-215 (0) |
[09 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
А. Фомин - А. Плакхин Игра Бодянского 25-м чемпионате СССР 1965 г. Г. Хацкевич, 1979 (0) |
[09 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
В.Голосуев - Н. Шагин, 1967 г. Игра Бодянского Урок 20 - стр.185 (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(449) Уроки 23,24 и 25 - $4.Жертва Кукуева стр.242-255 (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(449) Уроки 23,24 и 25 - $4.Жертва Кукуева стр.242-255 (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(449) Уроки 23,24 и 25 - $4.Жертва Кукуева стр.242-255 (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
А. Рист - Э. Рыбаков Полуфинал 23-го первенства СССР, 1963 г. Кол Сокова (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Н. Абациев - В. Максимчук Чемпионат ВС СССР, 1975 г. Отыгрыш 25 уроков шашечной игры (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Н. Абациев - В. Максимчук Чемпионат ВС СССР, 1975 г. Отыгрыш 25 уроков шашечной игры, 1979 (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(311) Уроки 14 и 15 - $3.Задания для самостоятельного решения (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(310) Уроки 14 и 15 - $2.Практические партии (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Г. Петрович - А. Хапалюк Первенство БГУ, 1965 г Обратная игра Бодянского (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(305) Уроки 14 и 15 - $1.Позиции со связкой левого фланга (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Г. Петрович - А. Хапалюк Первенство БГУ, 1965 г Обратная игра Бодянского (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(296) Уроки 14 и 15 - $1.Позиции со связкой левого фланга (0) |
[19 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 392 - 20(38) - 1983, Киевская защита, Комбинационные приемы, (0) |
[19 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 078-01(06) 1983, Кол, Связанные шашки (0) |
[18 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 260-50(33) -1983, Киевская защита, Комбинационные приемы, (0) |
[17 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 381 - 05(38) - 1983, Тычок, Комбинационные приемы, (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 084 - 10(06) - 1983, Связанные шашки, Тычок, (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 270 - 14 (34)-1983, Соковский кол (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 141 - 08(09) - 1983, Тычок, опорные точки, активные шашки, (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 146-14(09) 1983, Соковский кол (0) |
[15 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 432-24(310) 1983 (0) |
[15 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 046 - 22(03) - 1983, Безымянное начало, Комбинационные приемы, (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 25-18(02) 1983 (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 445 - 04(55) - 1983, Безымянное начало, Комбинационные приемы, (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 315 - 15 (36) 1983 (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 047 - 23(03) - 1983, Безымянное начало, Комбинационные приемы, (0) |
[13 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 264 - 5 (34) 1983 (0) |
|