Главная » Статьи » шашки-100 |
---------------------------------
Exercise 4.1 How did black win after 50.38 – 32 ?
Baba Sy – Verleene
An interesting variation in this position is: 1.21 – 17 19 – 24 2.39 – 33 14 – 19 …. Exercise 4.2 How can white surprisingly secure a win? Dibman – LetsjinskiWhite has a strong central and compact position with good formations and no edge piece at <35>. White begins taking control over the left wing. 23.37 – 31 26 x 37 24.42 x 31 6 – 11 25.48 – 42 11 – 17 26.42 – 37 17 – 21 27.27 – 22 18 x 27 28.31 x 22White can take more space helped by the tactical variation 28… 12 – 18? 29.34 – 29! 23 x 34 30.40 x 29 18 x 27 31.29 – 23 10 – 14 32.23 – 18 13 x 22 33.28 x 26 and white wins piece 27. After 28… 21 – 26 29.22 – 18 13 x 22 30.28 x 8 3 x 12 31.36 – 31 black’s position is weakened, having many gaps. 28… 12 – 17 29.22 x 11 16 x 7 30.36 – 31 21 – 26 31.31 – 27 7 – 12It’s time to use the 34 / 40 / 45 tail now putting pressure on the centre. 32.34 – 29 23 x 34 33.40 x 29 20 – 25 34.29 x 20 25 x 14 35.45 – 40 15 – 20White still has the compact centre, while his opponent is chased away from <23> and <24>. White has space to launch an attack at the left wing. 36.28 – 22 3 – 8 37.22 – 17 12 x 21 38.27 x 16 1 – 7Black doesn’t allow white to go to <11>. At 1 – 6 white breaks through with 16 – 11 6 x 17 37 – 31 26 x 28 33 x 11. 39.40 – 34 19 – 23 40.32 – 27 14 – 19 41.27 – 22 20 – 24 42.37 – 32!An excellent move! White can leave the piece at <26> alone for one move time and transports the piece to a much better location at <27>. In the meanwhile centre piece <23> is eliminated. 42… 10 – 14 43.32 – 28 23 x 32 44.38 x 27 8 – 12White can play 45.33 – 28 threatening 27 – 21 W+, but after 45… 12 – 18 46.43 – 38 but he forces a breakthrough in an even smarter way. 45.43 – 38! 14 – 2043… 19 – 23 44.38 – 32 14 – 19 45.33 – 28 Threatening 27 – 21 W+. 45… 12 – 18 46.22 – 17! leads to a winning breakthrough for white. 46.38 – 32 20 – 25 47.34 – 29 24 – 30 48.33 – 28 12 – 18White has forced a breakthrough. White’s king will be caught but white breaks through again. 49.29 – 23 18 x 29 50.27 – 21 26 x 17 51.22 x 2 19 – 24 42.2 x 19 24 x 13 53.16 – 11After 53… 13 – 18 54.11 – 7 9 – 14 55.32 – 27 14 – 20 56.27 – 21 30 – 34 57.39 x 30 25 x 34 58.21 – 16 18 – 22 59.28 x 17 34 – 39 60.7 – 1 34 – 39 61.1 – 40 39 – 43 62.40 – 44 33 – 38 63.44 – 49 20 – 25 64.17 – 11 25 – 30 65.11 – 6 30 – 34 66.6 – 1 43 – 48 67.49 x 32 black resigned at last. Baba Sy – LarosWhite uses the little space available at the left wing to launch an attack. 38.26 – 21! Exercise 4.3 Black replied 38… 11 – 17. Which kingshot did white take?It is interesting to analyse the position when black plays the normal move 43…. 11 – 16. White then plays 44.28 – 22! 7 – 11 45.34 – 30 20 – 25 46.48 – 43 25 x 34 47.39 x 30 1) 47… 11 – 17 48.22 x 11 16 x 7 49.33 – 28 7 – 11 50.28 – 22 11 – 16 52.38 – 33 4 – 9 53.33 – 28 23 – 29 54.43 – 38 18 – 23 55.45 – 40 9 – 14 56.30 – 25 12 – 18 57.21 – 17 with a wonderful winning position: W+. 2) 47… 23 – 29 48.45 – 40 18 – 23 49.43 – 39 4 – 10 50.39 – 34! 10 – 14 51.33 – 28 11 – 17 52.22 x 11 16 x 7 53.28 – 22! 23 – 28 54.32 x 23! 19 x 26 55.30 x 10 W+. We didn’t review all possibilities, but we wanted to show some important variations for this kind of play. 5.The piece at <17>We saw Sijbrands going to <34> while attacking with black. A piece at <17> or <34> can be very strong. If you attack the left wing you sometimes can get control over <17> which often helps to freeze the opponent out. Korchow – GiljarowYou wouldn’t expect white to get control over <17> from such a quiet closed classical position… 24.34 – 29 23 x 34 25.39 x 30 18 – 23 26.36 – 31 21 – 26Playing 26… 1 – 7 27.31 – 26 7 – 11 28.26 x 17 11 x 31 29.37 x 26 13 – 18 would have prevented white’s future attack. 27.27 – 22 1 – 7 28.31 – 27 8 – 12White is going to take the left wing under control now. 29.37 – 31 26 x 37 30.42 x 31 24 – 29 31.33 x 24 20 x 29 32.40 – 34 29 x 40 33.45 x 34 15 – 20 34.38 – 33 12 – 18 35.31 – 26 20 – 24Black has taken <24> but white builds the 33 / 38 / 42 tail to conquer control over <24>. 36.43 – 38 9 – 14 37.48 – 42 7 – 11 38.26 – 21 3 – 8 39.21 – 17 4 – 10White has conquered <17>. With the next exchange white gains more space. 33 – 29 x 29 would allow 16 – 21 =. 40.33 – 29 24 x 33 41.28 x 39 10 – 1541… 14 – 20 could have been met by 32 – 28! 23 x 12 34 – 29 18 x 27 30 – 24 19 x 30 35 x 4 +. White can choose how to win now. He can play, for example: 42.39 – 33: 1) 42… 15 – 20 43.33 – 29 20 – 25 44.29 – 24 and it’s over (8 – 12 17 x 8 13 x 2 22 x 13 19 x 8 24 – 20 etc. W+). 2) 42… 14 – 20 43.27 – 21! (43.30 – 25 is also good enough, but we show the most special way to win) 18 x 27 43… 16 x 27 44.32 x 21 18 x 16 45.33 – 29 11 x 22 29 x 9 W+ 44.33 – 28 11 x 33 45.38 x 9 27 x 47 46.34 – 29! 16 x 27 47.9 – 3 47 x 24 48.3 x 25 and black’s king is caught at the next move. 42.30 – 24 19 x 30 43.35 x 24 14 – 1943… 14 – 20 44.34 – 30 20 x 29 45.39 – 33 29 – 34 46.30 x 39 15 – 20 47.39 – 34 20 – 24 48.42 – 37 is winning for white. 44.34 – 30 8 – 12 45.17 x 8 13 x 2 46.22 x 13 19 x 8 47.39 – 33 8 – 13 48.30 – 25 23 – 29Otherwise 33 – 28 would follow. 49.42 – 37 29 x 20 50.25 x 14 11 – 17 51.37 – 31And white won the endgame. G. Kolk – P. MeursBlack played 41… 15 – 20 in this complex situation. Exercise 5.1 How could white have won now? Goedemoed – DollerWhite’s pieces surround the black centre. He is going to gain more space. 36.28 – 22 20 – 25 37.43 – 38 7 – 11 38.26 – 21 11 – 1638… 11 – 17 39.21 x 12 18 x 7 40.48 – 42 4 – 9 41.33 – 29 24 x 33 42.38 x 18 3 – 8 43.42 – 38 8 – 12 44.38 – 33 12 x 23 45.27 – 21! 7 – 12 46.33 – 29 12 – 18 47.22 – 17 is winning for white. 39.48 – 42 4 – 10 40.33 – 29 24 x 33 41.38 x 29 10 – 14 42.42 – 38?The correct way to play had been 42.29 – 24 6 – 11 43.24 – 20 3 – 9 44.20 – 15 11 – 17 45.22 x 11 16 x 7 46.42 – 37 7 – 11 47.21 – 16 11 – 17 48.37 – 31 etc. W+. 42… 14 – 20 43.38 – 33 3 – 8?After 43… 3 – 9! 44.21 – 17 20 – 24 45.29 x 20 25 x 14 46.30 – 25 19 – 24 47.35 – 30 24 x 35 48.33 – 28 14 – 19 49.25 – 20 6 – 11 50.17 x 6 16 – 21 51.27 x 16 18 x 38 black escapes. 44.21 – 17 20 – 24 45.29 x 20 25 x 14 46.33 – 29Black is lost. He eventually did after 14 – 20 47.30 – 25 20 – 24 48.29 x 20 6 – 11 49.17 x 6 16 – 21 50.27 x 16 18 x 38 51. 6 – 1 38 – 43 52. 1 x 29 19 - 24 53.29 - 33 24 x 15 54.33 - 44 15 – 20 55.25 x 14 43 – 48 56.44 – 39 48 – 37 57.39 – 22 37 x 5 58.22 x 9 5 – 28 59. 9 – 18 28 – 14 60.34 – 30 14 – 28 61.30 – 25 28 – 33 62.18 – 23 8 – 13 63.23 – 5 W+. Dolfing – ScholmaWhite could have played 22 – 17! After which black can’t play 12 – 18 because of 44 – 40 21 x 12 28 – 22 18 x 27 38 – 32 27 x 29 34 x 5. Exercise 5.2 How does white win after 1.22 – 17! 25 – 30 34 x 25 12 – 18 ? Goedemoed – TuikWhite has to take care about 16 – 21. Usually he can go 17 – 11 6 x 17 36 – 31 26 x 28 33 x 11 then. But if you look closer black can prevent a breakthrough and thereby getting an advantage. Exercise 5.3 What is the best move for white, eliminating the 16 – 21 possibility? Baljakin – SambBlack just played 13 – 18 giving his opponent the opportunity to make the Ghestem-lock (see the section about classics). 36.28 – 22 9 – 13?Because white has a winning plan now, black should have played 8 – 13 in order to be able to remove a piece at <17>. 37.33 – 28 1 – 6 38.22 – 17!Black has no defence left against the threatening 37 – 31. 38… 23 – 29 39.37 – 31 26 x 37 40.17 x 26Black resigned. 6.Cannon playTo be successful playing in the centre you need strong formations. A strong construction that is often used is the so called Tsjizjow cannon. Tsjizjow – G. van AaltenWch 1990 The cannon consists of pieces 27 / 31 / 32 / 36 / 37 / 38 / 42. Sometimes the cannon is played without 42, but this pieces gives more opportunities like playing 33 – 29 x 29. White can also change 27 – 22 x 22 if he wishes, but white rather plays towards the centre first. 34.33 – 28 18 – 23 35.38 – 33 21 – 26More logical is playing 12 – 18 preventing white from taking the 33 – 29 x 27 exchange. 35.40 – 35White waits for better conditions to make the 33 – 29 exchange, breaking the classical structure. Actually 33 – 29 would have been the most correct move leading to an advantage for white. 35… 15 – 20? 36.48 – 43Now 36… 12 – 18 isn’t good anymore. White responds 37.34 – 30! 5 – 10 38.42 – 38 10 – 14 39.30 – 25 8 – 13 40.43 – 39 11 – 17 41.39 – 34 17 – 21 41… 6 – 11 is punished by 34 – 29 23 x 34 27 – 21 16 x 27 32 x 23 W+ 42.27 – 22! 18 x 27 43.31 x 22 and because the only sensible move left 6 – 11 is met by 34 – 29 23 x 34 22 – 18 13 x 22 28 x 6 black is lost. 36… 5 – 10 37.33 – 29! 24 x 22 38.27 x 29White has gained space. He controls <27> and <28> while black has inactive pieces at the edge of the board. Pieces 6 / 11 / 16 / 16 will not become active in the game. Black probably didn’t play 10 – 15 because he was afraid of the attack 29 – 23 x 23 and piece 15 stays inactive. 38… 8 – 13 39.31 – 27 10 – 14 40.43 – 38 20 – 25?Black should have played 13 – 18! 32 – 28 12 – 17! = White could have prevented this drawing variation by 41.35 – 30! Black’s defence, changing back, is very poor. White is going to control all strategic squares. 41.32 – 28 14 – 20 42.38 – 32 20 – 24 43.29 x 20 25 x 14 44.34 – 29!45…. 14 – 20 will result in a winning attack: 46.28 – 23 19 x 28 47.32 x 23 11 – 17 48.35 – 30 20 – 25 49.30 – 24 17 – 21 50.37 – 32! 6 – 11 51.23 – 19! 11 – 17 52.19 x 8 13 x 2 53.42 – 37 3 – 9 54.29 – 23 9 – 13 55.23 – 19 13 – 18 56.36 – 31! 17 – 22 57.19 – 13 18 x 9 58.27 x 18 9 – 14 59.31 – 27 14 – 20 60.24 x 15 25 – 30 and going to <5> will give the 37 – 31 shot, winning the game. 44… 12 – 17 45.36 – 31!Black’s only formation is worthless now. 45… 17 – 21 46.35 – 30Black surrendered. 46… 11 – 17 47.29 – 24 6 – 11 48.42 – 38 is a horror scenario. Sivtsev – TsjizjowWhite has many pieces at the edge of the board. His centre is weak. He doesn’t control any of the strategic squares and has a weakness at <42>. Black has nice formations in the centre and a cannon a his left wing. Black will attack at white’s right wing. 31… 24 – 30! 32.35 x 24 20 x 29 37.33 x 24 19 x 30 38.39 – 33 14 – 19 39.31 – 27 15 – 20 40.43 – 39 20 – 24 41.49 – 43 23 – 29!41.49 – 43? created a weak piece at 43, it isn’t active. Black has a beautiful construction. White’s space is limited severely. 42.27 – 21 1 – 7 43.36 – 31 18 – 22!White’s position is entirely blocked. 32 – 27 13 – 18 is a dead track. 32 – 28 isn’t possible because of 30 – 34 etc. W+. Therefore white gave a piece playing 44.31 – 27 and lost. Wiersma – Der 24.39 – 33 20 – 2524… 20 – 24 is answered by 25.33 – 29! 24 x 22 26.27 x 29 with white taking more control over the centre. If black changes to 24 after this by 19 – 24 27.29 x 20 15 x 24 white builds the 33 / 38 / 42 tail to put pressure on 24. We will give an example, so you learn what you have to do with white: 28.38 – 33 4 – 10 29.43 – 38 13 – 19 30.34 – 29 10 – 15 31.29 x 20 15 x 24 32.33 – 29 24 x 33 33.38 x 29 19 – 23 34.29 x 18 12 x 23 35.35 – 30 Piece 23 stands alone, so white can surround it. 7 – 12 36.30 – 24 8 – 13 37.50 – 44 3 – 9 38.24 – 20 13 – 19 39.44 – 40 12 – 18 40.40 – 34 21 – 26 41.42 – 38 11 – 17 42.31 – 27 17 – 21 43.38 – 33 6 – 11 44.33 – 28 11 – 17 45.48 – 42 17 – 22 46.28 x 17 21 x 12 47.42 – 38 It is a long way to get the position wanted. Black to move is lost. At 12 – 17 white takes the 34 – 29 27 – 21 kingshot. 47.. 9 – 13 is answered by 34 – 30 (preventing the 23 – 28 13 – 19 shot) followed by a breakthrough of piece 20. 25.43 – 39 15 – 20 26.50 – 44 3 – 9White was ready to meet 20 – 24 by 33 – 29 24 x 22 27 x 29 again. Black plays with his golden piece, which is weakening his defensive position. In order to force a decision on his opponent white himself waits, playing his golden piece himself. 27.48 – 43We will show you another long term strategy for white after black plays 27… 4 – 10 28.28 – 22! 12 – 18 29.31 – 26 7 – 12 30.26 x 17 12 x 21 31.22 – 17 11 x 31 32.37 x 17 8 – 12 33.17 x 8 13 x 2 34.32 – 27 9 – 13 35.38 – 32 6 – 11 36.36 – 31 11 – 17 37.33 – 28 20 – 24 38.31 – 26 10 – 14 39.34 – 30 25 x 34 40.39 x 30 2 – 8 41.30 – 25 White has a classical position controlling both wings. We will show three variations: 1) If black tries to break the classical structure, playing 41… 24 – 29, hoping for 14 – 20 x 10 x 24, white plays 42.43 – 38! and 29 – 34 27 – 22 leads to a bad endgame for black. 2) 41… 8 – 12 42.44 – 40 24 – 29 43.35 – 30 is lost: 16 – 21 27 x 16 18 – 22 is punished by 32 – 27! W+ 3) 41… 23 – 29 42.44 – 40 8 – 12 43.42 – 38 18 – 23 (the Dussaut sacrifice 16 – 21 27 x 16 18 – 22 fails to the 25 – 20! stick move.) 44.43 – 39 12 – 18 45.40 – 34! 29 x 40 46.35 x 44 24 – 29 47.39 – 33 29 – 34 48.44 – 39 34 x 43 49.38 x 49 W+ 27… 21 – 26 28.34 – 30 25 x 34 29.39 x 30 20 – 24White forces a win now. Black should have defended his position with 29… 4 – 10. 30.28 – 22! 23 – 29White was threatening 22 – 18, while 12 – 18 would have been punished by the 33 – 29 27 – 21 32 x 1 kingshot. 31.33 – 28! 4 – 1031… 12 – 18 32.28 – 23 19 x 17 33.30 x 19 13 x 24 34.27 – 21 16 x 27 35.32 x 14 W+. After 31… 12 – 17 there are multiple ways to win. 32.44 – 40 10 – 14 33.30 – 25Black doesn’t have any good move left. He played 33… 12 – 17 34.35 – 30 24 x 44 and surrendered without waiting for his execution: 25 – 20 14 x 25 43 – 39 44 x 33 28 x 39 17 x 28 32 x 1 W+. W. v.d. Kooij – G. Jansen 39.30 – 25 9 – 14!Building the cannon. 40.31 – 26 17 – 22 41.32 – 28 23 x 32 42.38 x 27 22 x 31 43.26 x 3740.40 – 34 would have been a better defence. White’s change back is very passive. Black gains a lot of space. Black could have forced a positional win by 43… 18 – 22! 1) 44.37 – 31 24 – 30! 45.25 x 34 22 – 27 46.31 x 22 13 – 18 47.22 x 24 20 x 49 B+. 2) 44.37 – 32 19 – 23 45.43 – 38 13 – 19 B+. 3) 44.43 – 38 22 – 27! 45.33 – 28 13 – 18! 46.28 – 22 27 – 31! 47.37 x 26 18 x 27 48.39 – 33 19 – 23 49.40 – 34 24 – 29! 50.33 x 24 20 x 40 51.45 x 34 23 – 28 breaking through. In the game black played 43… 19 – 23? 44.43 – 38 18 – 22 45.40 – 34 White should have played 37 – 31 preventing 22 – 27. 45… 22 – 27! 46.34 – 30 13 – 19 47.39 – 34 23 – 29 48.34 x 23 19 x 39 49.30 x 10 15 x 4 50.25 x 14 39 – 44 B+. Domchev – Milshin Exercise 6.1 Black to move built a cannon. What is the strongest move for black? Can you think of a variation that is winning for black? Oudshoorn – Wiersma Exercise 6.2 Answer the questions!A) How is 46.38 – 32 13 – 18 47.43 – 38 punished? 46.38 – 33 13 – 18!B) How is 47.40 – 34 punished? 47.43 – 38 17 – 22 48.40 – 34 22 x 31 49.26 x 37C) How does black win after 48.38 – 32 22 x31 49.26 x 37 ? 49… 18 – 22 50.34 – 30?The best defence would have been 50.37 – 31. D) Which strong move does black play now? Cosmos – Protein 04Position from a blitz game at Kurnik, a Polish online draughts server. Exercise 6.3 How does white force a win? Use tactical weapons! Tj. Harmsma – J.E. de VriesThe conditions for cannon play are good. 1) Black has inactive pieces, a fork, at his right wing. 2) White has developed his position completely 3) White has enough formations to act at the other wing. 26.48 – 43!A psychologically very strong move. White wants his opponent to make an important decision. After the immediate 33 – 29 x 29 he is chased back by 19 – 23. However after the change back form black the exchange to 29 becomes much stronger. 26… 14 – 20?26… 17 – 22 would have been more active. 27.25 x 14 19 x 10 28.30 – 25 10 – 14 29.33 – 29! 23 x 34 30.40 x 29 13 – 19 31.45 – 40 2 – 7?A big mistake. Black builds a tail he can’t use at the next move, and by this weakening his defence at <2>. White could already have played 29 – 24 x 24 strongly now. 32.40 – 34 3 – 932… 18 – 23 33.29 x 18 12 x 23 is punished by the 27 – 22 38 – 33 shot. 33.43 – 39 8 – 13 34.39 – 33 15 – 20?Moves that don’t look good usually aren’t good. 34… 18 – 23 35.29 x 18 12 x 23 can be strongly met by 36.33 – 29! 23 – 28 Obliged, for 13 – 18 is answered by 27 – 22 17 x 28 34 – 30W + 37.32 x 23 19 x 28 38.34 – 30 and black is in trouble. Still he should have chosen this variation, because the game is even worse. 35.31 – 26 18 – 23 36.29 x 18 13 x 31 37.36 x 27 17 – 22 38.27 x 18 12 x 23 39.33 – 29!The only temp black has got to make the 2 x 2 exchange is 19 – 24 which leads to a lethal arrow lock: 19 – 24 40.29 x 18 16 – 21 41.26 x 17 11 x 13 42.34 – 30 13 – 19 43.32 – 28 W+. 39… 11 – 17 40.29 x 18 7 – 11 41.26 – 21!Black surrendered after this last tactical move. Krajenbrink – SekongoWhite built two pyramids. A cannon and a right wing pyramid. 36.40 – 35 20 – 25 37.29 x 20 15 x 24 38.34 – 29! 21 – 26 39.29 x 20 25 x 14 40.33 – 29! 11 – 17 41.39 – 34!White allows black to lock his left wing. The attack at the right wing continues anyway. 41… 17 – 21 42.29 – 24! 12 – 17 43.38 – 33 6 – 11 44.34 – 30!44… 17-22 is punished by 45.32 - 28! W+ 44… 18 – 22 45.27 x 18 13 x 22 46.32 – 28 8 – 13 47.30 – 25 13 – 18 48.43 – 38 9 – 13 49.24 – 20 14 – 19 50.20 – 15 22 – 27 51.31 x 22 18 x 27 52.37 – 32 26 – 31 53.33 – 29!White won. Tsjizjow – KeiselsBlack has many pieces at the end of the board. Centre piece 23 is not supported by a very strong centre due to a lack of formations. We also spot a weakness at 9. On the contrary white has strong formations at his right wing and is going to build the cannon at his left wing. 36.48 – 42!36… 13 – 19 37.33 – 28 leads to a very good classical position for white: 20 – 24 38.39 – 33 8 – 13 40.43 – 39 21 – 26 41.42 – 37 11 – 17 42.50 – 44 6 – 11 43.44 – 40 35 x 44 44.39 x 50 17 – 21 45.27 – 22 18 x 27 46.31 x 22 11 – 17 47.22 x 11 16 x 7 48.36 – 31 7 – 11 49.31 – 27 11 – 16 50.27 – 22 W+. 36… 8 – 12 37.42 – 37 8 – 12 Exercise 6.4 How did white force a win now?We examine the position after black plays the logical 37… 21 – 26 Exercise 6.5 White can win using a silent move. Which move is winning and why? H. Jansen – H. WiersmaBlack has strong formations. White hasn’t any base piece left. Moreover he can’t play the natural 37 – 32 move because of the 17 – 22 24 – 29 kingshot. 27.34 – 29 21 – 26 28.37 – 32 17 – 22 29.28 x 17 12 x 21After 30.32 – 28 black forces a win by 30… 18 – 22 (or 21 – 27 first) 31.28 x 17 11 x 22 Threatening 22 – 28 followed by 21 – 27 32.41 – 37 21 – 27! with a winning position for black. After 30.42 – 37 black again wins playing 30… 18 – 22 31.40 – 34 21 – 27! 32.32 x 21 26 x 17 33.38 – 32 22 – 28! 34.32 x 23 19 x 28 35.33 x 22 17 x 28 winning a piece. White’s best move is 30.41 – 37 30.40 – 34? 11 – 16 31.42 – 37 21 – 27 32.32 x 21 16 x 27 33.37 – 32 19 – 23 34.32 x 21 26 x 17White is getting chain-locked. 35.38 – 32 6 – 1135… 17 – 21 would have been better, but white makes a big mistake. 36.36 – 31?White is chain-locked and has too many gaps. Exercise 6.6 With which move did black force a win? Exercise 6.7 Black has a cannon. In Borkowa – Luteijn white missed the opportunity to perform a nice shot. Try to find it. Krajenbrink – Vermin Exercise 6.8 White has a very nice plan forcing a break through by making a sacrifice. Try to find the winning manoeuvre. Tsjizjow – A. van Prinsenbeek Exercise 6.9 What strong move did white play?10-fold world champion Tsjizjow from Russia posing near his famous cannon. A cannon in the openingIn the opening of a game you often can build a cannon already. We will give some examples of typical openings for cannon play. 1.34 – 29 19 – 23 2.40 – 34 14 – 19 3.45 – 40 10 – 14 4.32 – 28 23 x 32 5.37 x 28Black can choose from many continuations now. 5… 18 – 23 6.29 x 18 12 x 32 7.38 x 27 7 – 12White can begin building Tsjizjow’s cannon now. We show a normal play in which white is going to build the cannon. 8.41 – 37 12 – 18At 8… 17 – 21 white can choose from 46 – 41 21 x 32 37 x 28 with centre play or developing 37 – 32 21 – 26 33 – 28 2 x 37 42 x 31 with the possibility of building a cannon. 9.42 – 38 1 – 7 10.46 – 41 7 – 12 11.37 – 32 19 – 23 12.41 – 37 14 – 19 13.47 – 42Black can’t develop his left wing immediately by playing 5 – 10? Because of a Harlem shot. If black plays 9 – 14 white should weaken black’s centre a bit and try to get active at the right wing. Usually he plays 50 – 45 4 – 9 34 – 29 x 30. The 34 – 29 x 30 exchange is typical for cannon play. White can make a double exchange in another way here. 13… 9 – 14 14.34 – 30 20 – 25Black wants to develop his wing to activate piece 5. He can also choose 14… 4 – 9 15.30 – 25 20 – 24. 15.50 – 45 25 x 34 16.40 x 29 23 x 34 17.39 x 30 19 – 23With a more or less equal play. We give another examples of opening play with the canon: 1.32 – 28 18 – 22 2.37 – 32 12 – 18 3.41 – 37 7 – 12 4.46 – 41 1 – 7 6.31 – 26 19 – 23 7.33 – 28 22 x 33 8.39 x 19 13 x 24 9.44 – 39 Black is going to build the cannon playing 10 – 14 / 5 – 10 / 9 – 13 / 14 – 19 / 10 – 14. If white has occupied 28 in the meantime black will continue playing the typical 17 – 22 x 21 gaining space (4 temps). Solutions section 2: Lesson 1: Centre play 1.1 33 – 29 24 x 22 27 x 29 breaking the classical structure and getting control over wings and centre. 1.2 34 – 29 23 x 34 40 x 20 15 x 24 39 – 34 attacking <24>. 1.3 27 – 22 18 x 27 31 x 22 removing piece 18 such that after 11 – 17 22 x 11 16 x 7 23 – 29 23 x 34 40 x 20 15 x 24 39 – 34 the attack at <24> succeeds: the black piece at 18 otherwise could go to 23 preventing the next attack. 1.4 48 – 43 is even better than 49 – 43 having more power at the right wing. The next move will be 34 – 29. Lesson 2: The powerblock 2.1 12 – 18! 40 – 34 18 – 22! 27 x 29 39 – 44 =. 2.2 34 – 29 23 x 34 40 x 20 19 – 23 28 x 19 13 x 15 25 – 20 14 x 34 33 – 29 34 x 23 37 – 31 26 x 28 27 – 22 18 x 27 38 – 32 27 x 38 42 x 4 W+ 2.3 34 – 29 23 x 34 40 x 20 15 x 24 45 – 40 13 – 18 40 – 34 4 – 10 34 – 29 10 – 15 29 x 20 15 x 24 27 – 22! 18 x 27 33 – 28Black can’t play 24 – 29 now because of 28 – 22 27 x 18 38 – 33 29 x 27 37 – 31 26 x 37 42 x 4 W+. 27 – 31 36 x 27 24 – 29 38 – 33 29 x 38 42 x 33 9 – 13 47 – 41 13 – 18 28 – 22 18 – 23 30 – 24 19 x 30 35 x 24 W+ 2.4 37 – 31! 26 x 37 42 x 31 and because 21 – 26 is answered by the 27 – 21 bomb shot white locks his opponent at the next move playing 31 – 26. 2.5 41 – 36?! 17 – 22 28 x 17 11 x 31 36 x 27 26 – 3? 37 x 17 23 – 28 32 x 12 13 – 18?Black can escape by giving one piece more by 24 – 30 =. 12 x 23 19 x 50 17 – 12! 8 x 17 27 – 22 17 x 28 43 – 39 50 x 33 38 x 9 3 x 14 W+1. 2.6 34 – 29 23 x 34 40 x 20 15 x 24 28 – 23 19 x 39 30 x 10 4 x 15 37 – 31 26 x 28 38 – 33 21 x 32 33 x 4 W+ Lesson 3: The strong piece at <21> 3.1 34 – 29 14 – 20 (6 – 11 29 x 20 14 x 2537 – 31 26 x 37 43 – 39 17 x 26 28 – 23 W+) 43 – 39 9 – 13 39 – 34 18 – 22 can be met by 37 – 31 26 x 37 38 – 32 17 x 26 28 x 8 37 x 30 8 – 3 24 x 33 3 x 14 W+ 20 – 25 29 x 20 25 x 14 34 – 29 6 – 11 (after 18 – 22 white can neglect the 29 – 24 37 – 31 breakthrough and play 45 – 40 etc. +) 36 – 31 11 – 16 31 – 27 W+ Lesson 4: The left wing attack 4.1 19 – 23 28 x 19 24 x 13 35 x 24 17 – 22 39 x 30 22 – 28 choice 18 x 49 B+ 4.2 3.17 – 11 7 x 16 4.22 – 17 (8 – 12 17 x 8 13 x 2 25 – 20) W+ 4.3 34 – 29 23 x 43 48 x 39 17 x 26 27 – 22 18 x 27 32 x 21 26 x 17 35 – 30 (preventing the king to be caught) 24 x 35 28 – 23 19 x 28 33 x 2 W+ Lesson 5: The piece at <17> 5.1 22 – 18 13 x 11 28 – 23 29 x 18* 36 – 31 26 x 37 38 – 32 37 x 28 33 x 4 W+ 5.2 22 – 17 25 – 30 34 x 25 12 – 18 44 – 40 21 x 12 28 – 22 18 x 27 38 – 32 27 x 29 37 – 31 26 x 37 48 – 42 37 x 48 39 – 34 48 x 30 25 x 5 W+ 5.3 45 – 40! 16 – 21? 17 – 11 6 x 17 36 – 31 26 x 28 33 x 11 15 – 20 25 x 12 18 x 16 35 – 30 35 x 33 38 x 9 W+. Lesson 6: Canon play 6.1 24 – 29! 33 x 24 20 x 291) 31 – 26 18 – 23! 43 – 38 17 – 21 26 x 17 29 – 33 38 x 18 13 x 31 with good chances to win. 2) 43 – 38 17 – 21! 31 – 26 29 – 33! (even better than 18 – 23 & 29 – 33) 38 x 29 19 – 23 26 x 17 23 x 43 35 – 30 18 – 23!! with good winning chances after 40 – 35 23 – 28 32 x 23 43 – 49 etc. 3) 43 – 38 17 – 21 35 – 30 19 – 23 31 – 26 14 – 19! 26 x 17 19 – 24 30 x 28 18 – 22 27 x 18 13 x 42 W+ 6.2 A) 18 – 22 27 x 29 24 x 42B) 18 – 22 27 x 29 19 – 23 29 x 18 24 – 30 35 x 24 20 x 49 (19 – 13 49 – 35 B+) C) 23 – 29 33 – 28 29 – 33 28 – 23 18 x 29 39 x 28 29 – 34 40 x 29 24 x 22 B+ D) 22 – 27! 6.3 31 – 26! 22 x 31 36 x 27 threatening a coup Philippe with 27 – 22 etc. At 7 – 11 white can neglect the shot and play 33 – 28 with positional win. At 17 – 22 white plays 33 – 28! 22 x 44 27 – 22 18 x 27 32 x 21 16 x 27 43 – 39 44 x 33 38 x 29 W+ 6.4 33 – 28 13 – 18 38 – 33 threatening 28 – 22 while 20 – 24 is met by 28 – 22 17 x 28 33 x 13 19 x 8 34 – 30 25 x 34 39 x 28 W+ 6.5 38.50 – 45! At 11 – 17 or 12 – 17 white has 33 – 28. If white starts with 1.50 – 44? black would have the stick move 35 – 40. The only other move 38… 13 – 19 is punished by 39.32 – 28!! 23 x 21 (23 x 41 36 x 47 26 x 37 38 – 32 +) 40.37 – 32 26 x 28 41.33 x 15 W+. 6.6 8 – 12! Threatening 23 – 28 32 x 23 20 – 25 + while 32 – 27 is punished by 23 – 28 33 x 22 24 x 33 39 x 28 17 – 21 B+ 6.7 29 – 23! 18 x 29 35 – 30 24 x 44 33 x 24 44 x 31 36 x 18 13 x 33 24 x 4 W+ 6.8 31 – 26! 22 x 31 36 x 27 17 – 22 38 – 3! 22 x 31 32 – 28!! 23 x 41 26 x 46 followed by the 24 – 20 x 20 breakthrough. 6.9 45 – 40! followed by a double attack at piece 24.S2. Centre play | |
Просмотров: 616 | |
Всего комментариев: 0 | |
[16 Май 2024] | [Kasparov - Karpov WC 1990] |
Kasparov Garry - Karpov Anatoly World Championship Lyon (14), 1990 (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Шашки] |
Норель М. - Шведов Ш. VI-КубокСССР-1975 (0) |
[08 Май 2024] | [Шахматы] |
Euwe,Max - Alekhine,Alexander WCh 16 m Amsterdam, 1935 Kasparov,Garry (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Шашки] |
Тарохин В.Г. - Дробахин В.Н МЧ-3Ф мем.Чехова 1995.12.31 План: 11...fg7 (0) |
[12 Май 2024] | [Kasparov - Karpov WC 1990] |
Каспаров - Карпов Матч 1990, Нью-Йорк (0) |
[03 Авг 2014] | [Шахматы] |
Урок № 12 Правило квадрата шахматной пешки (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Шашки] |
Ниневяли - Зандерс VKR-7i 1982 Разветвление II: 10.hg3 (0) |
[17 Май 2024] | [Шахматы] |
Botvinnik,Mikhail - Euwe,Max [D26] Hastings, 1934 Kasparov,Garry (0) |
[02 Авг 2014] | [Шахматы] |
Урок № 10 Король + пешка против Короля (0) |
[13 Май 2024] | [Шашки] |
Фролов Г.И.- Лукьянов И.В. ВО-2002 2003 Разветвление I: 6...ba5 Ответ II: 10.fe5 (0) |
[01 Дек 2024] | [Ding Liren - Gukesh D FIDE WCCM 2024] |
Ding,Liren (2728) - Gukesh D (2783) [A45] FIDE World Championship Match 2024 Singapore SGP (6), 01.12.2024 (0) |
[01 Дек 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Via Roozenburg en Bonnard tot remise (0) |
[30 Ноя 2024] | [Ding Liren - Gukesh D FIDE WCCM 2024] |
Gukesh D (2783) - Ding,Liren (2728) [C01] FIDE World Championship Match 2024 Singapore SGP (5), 30.11.2024 (0) |
[29 Ноя 2024] | [Ding Liren - Gukesh D FIDE WCCM 2024] |
Ding,Liren (2728) - Gukesh D (2783) FIDE World Championship Match 2024 Singapore SGP (4), 29.11.2024 (0) |
[28 Ноя 2024] | [Ding Liren - Gukesh D FIDE WCCM 2024] |
Gukesh D (2783) - Ding,Liren (2728) [D02] FIDE World Championship Match 2024 Singapore SGP (3), 27.11.2024 (0) |
[27 Ноя 2024] | [Ding Liren - Gukesh D FIDE WCCM 2024] |
Ding,Liren (2728) - Gukesh D (2783) [C50] FIDE World Championship Match 2024 Singapore SGP (2), 26.11.2024 (0) |
[27 Ноя 2024] | [Ding Liren - Gukesh D FIDE WCCM 2024] |
Gukesh D (2783) - Ding,Liren (2728) WCC Match 2024 Singapore (1.1), 25.11.2024 (0) |
[27 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Levensgevaarlijk maar speelbaar (0) |
[26 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Adequaat tegenspel tot de eindfase (0) |
[25 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Twee moeizame winstpartijen (0) |
[23 Ноя 2024] | [Checkers-100] |
Ton Sijbrands - Wlm Terlouw (Blindsimultaan Lutten 2002) (0) |
[23 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Van Marle kent ook zijn klassiekers (0) |
[22 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Explosief flankduel met veel rekenwerk (0) |
[21 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
De strategisch beste prestaties (0) |
[20 Ноя 2024] | [Sijbrands Ton] |
Уникальный опыт, полученный благодаря многочисленным жертвам (0) |
Аркады и экшн [67] | Настольные [7] |
Головоломки [115] | Слова [2] |
Поиск предметов [68] | Стратегии [15] |
Многопользовательские [21] | Другие [4] |
Советский человек и студент ИАТЭ — антисамураи.(Рыбников Ю.А.) | Как умер первый материалист Европы? От обжорства! Логика такая — раз души нет, давайте есть побольше.(Рыбников Ю.А.) |
Не ты управляешь привычкой, а привычка управляет тобой. Это зомбирование. (Политюков В.П.) | (студентке) Вы что, думаете, что если я вас допустил к экзамену, так вы по жизни победитель?(Масленников И.О.) |
Всем собрать последние силёнки и преодолеть пороки радости трудом!(Рыбников Ю.А.) | Ничто — это то, чего нет, как же оно может быть? Запишите это.(Рыбников Ю.А.) |
О! Великолепное определение получилось! Ничего не понятно, но в то же время слова какие-то умные звучат…(Масленников И.О.) | Признаюсь, я только один раз в жизни говорил с англичанином, поэтому этот разговор я запомнил на всю жизнь.(Рыбников Ю.А.) |
Что лежит в основании того, что «бога нет»? Наука или мифология? Конечно, мифология!(Рыбников Ю.А.) | Счастье — это напиться. Лимонада! (Рыбников Ю.А.) |
— Правильно! Вот вам зачёт будет! Только не так, как вы сказали, а «гомосексуалисты»!(Рыбников Ю.А.) | Христос-спаситель к ним не приходил.(Рыбников Ю.А.) |
Чеченцы убивают взглядом. (Политюков В.П.) | Чьи законы изучают физика, математика? Конечно, бога.(Рыбников Ю.А.) |
Кто, ты громче всех смеёшься? Сейчас пойдёшь доказывать к доске, что ты не верблюд! (Политюков В.П.) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Аркады и экшн] |
Побег из рая 2. Путь короля (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Головоломки] |
Любовная история. Проклятие (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Головоломки] |
Сокровища Монтесумы 3 (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Головоломки] |
Гавайский исследователь. Загадки Перл-Харбора (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Многопользовательские] |
Metin2 (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Многопользовательские] |
Gladiatus (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Головоломки] |
Самоучки. Эффект бабочки (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Поиск предметов] |
Побег из музея. Часть 2. Поиск пропавших сокровищ (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Поиск предметов] |
Затерянные жемчужины Таити (0) |
[17 Апр 2013] | [Головоломки] |
7 артефактов (0) |
[09 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Исаенко С. - Парамонов В. ВПФ-24, 2001 Московская система Возможность II: 7.dc3 (0) |
[08 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Литвинович В. - Симонян Б. XXV чемпионат СССР, 4.11.1965 Вариант I: 5.gf4 (0) |
[07 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Криворученко П.Д. - Кузнецов В.Н. XXXI чемп.России(пер), 1998 План I: 8.cb4? (0) |
[07 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Циркин - Кетлер F-10 X-Ч.СССР(пер), 1974 Московская система Разветвление I: 6...ba5 (0) |
[06 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Стручков Н. - Андреев Д. МАГ (классика), 1999 Московская система Ответ II: 14.cd4 (0) |
[06 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Высоцкий В. - Далимов В. Заочная встреча, 2004 Московская система План II: 12.ba5 (0) |
[05 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Высоцкий В. - Далимов В.Заочная встреча, 2004 Московская система План I: 12.ba3 (0) |
[05 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Тарохин В. - Росляков Г. РКГ-22d Ком.ч.России(пер) 2002 Московская система (0) |
[05 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Дрозд Н. - Дубянский Н. LXVI чемпионат Москвы, 1998 Система III: 3...gf6 4.b:d6 e:c5. (0) |
[04 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Скрабов В. - Валюк А. МАРШ-1995,1995 Московская система I.cd4 dc5 2.bc3 fg5 3.cb4 (0) |
[02 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Коган М. - Куперман И. Матч IX-Чемр.СССР-1947, 1947, Московская система (0) |
[02 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Султанов Р.Р. - Клевицкий Э.Д. ПОБЕДА-55, 2000 Система II Продолжение II: 6.ed2 (0) |
[01 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Симонян Б. - Вертинский Л. XXVI чемпионат СССР, Грозный,1966 Вариант II: 5...dc7 (0) |
[01 Май 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Соков В. - Торчинский Г. 1938 Система II Вариант I: 5...ba5 Продолжение II: 6.cd2 (0) |
[19 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия] |
Петров В. - Лебедев Ю. XXXIII чемпионат СССР, 1973 Система II. Вариант I: 5...ba5 (0) |
[18 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Мардер Л. - Сретенский Н.1956 Московский вариант (0) |
[18 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Корхов С. - Хейф Л. XI чемпионат СССР Москва 1949 Московский вариант (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Владыкин Г. - Блиндер Б. Продолжение III: 5...hg7 (0) |
[10 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Фазылов М. - Кандауров А. Звезды Самарканда 1982 (0) |
[23 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Ниедритис А. - Шафир В.МЧ-6/еПФ, 2002 Разветвление II: 7.hg3 (0) |
[23 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Цирик З. - Хейф Л. XIII чемпионат СССР, Харьков, 1951 (0) |
[22 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Попик И. - Савенок А. МАГ-92 (совр), 1992 Разветвление II: 7.hg3 (0) |
[21 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Азаров А - Мартынов И. МАРШ-1994, I.cd4 dc5. 2.bc3 fg5 3.cb4 gf6 4.b:d6 e:c5 5.gh4 fe5 (0) |
[21 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Мурсалов Э. - Плакхин А. Чемпионат ВЦСПС, 1979 Московский вариант (0) |
[20 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Абдуллаев У. - Доска И.Чемпионат ВЦСПС, 1976 Московский вариант (0) |
[20 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Куперман И. - Кравцов Н.1952 Московский вариант Вариант II: 5.gh4 (0) |
[19 Апр 2024] | [Городская партия-2] |
Хечумов Г. - Цирик З. XVIII чемпионат СССР, 1957 Московский вариант (0) |
[29 Июн 2017] | [Городская партия-2] |
Пуусепп Оскар-104 - 05-07 1983 Городская партия с 3. ...gh4 Изолированные шашки (0) |
[28 Июн 2017] | [Городская партия-2] |
Пуусепп Оскар-433-25-55 1983 Городская партия с 3. ...gh4 Сложные комбинации (0) |
[28 Июн 2017] | [Городская партия-2] |
Пуусепп Оскар-359-16-37 1983 Городская партия с 3. ...gh4 Принудительное удаление (0) |
[17 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Туманишвили - Пеепс ВКР-3 Ком.П-воСССР(пер), 1969 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[17 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Блиндер С. - Миротин Б. X чемпионат СССР, Рига 1947 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Веверис - Мартинсон Ком.Чемп.Латвии, 1991 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Соколовский М. - Ильяшенко А. XXX чемпионат Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Смаченко В. - Пустовит А. ФЗП-2 Золотое перо 1996 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[13 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Рамм Л. - Хейф Л. 10-Чемп.СССР п-ф, 1947 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[13 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Плакхин А. - Каспаров Ю. Чемпионат ВЦСПС Одесса 1974 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[12 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
А. Савин - А. Потапов, 2005 г., по переписке Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[12 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Шутилкин Н. - Коршунов Д. X чемпионат СССР 1947 Разветвление II: 8.ab2 (0) |
[11 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Зелтинс - Рутиньш XXXIV чемп.Латвии(пер),1998 (0) |
[11 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Еськов С. - Шогин Д. Ч-т России, Адлер 2006 1 тур Разветвление I: 8.dc5 (0) |
[11 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Мартынов А. - Созинов А. Ч-т России Адллер 2005 муж. Разветвление I: 8.dc5 (0) |
[10 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Павлов С. - Савенок А. Мемориал В.Сокова, 2002 Система V: 3.cb4 ba5 (0) |
[09 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Мельников В. - Марцинюк Е.О.МО-30а, 1997 Разветвление II: 11.de5 (0) |
[09 Май 2024] | [Городская партия-3] |
Ремесис А. - Старобинский М.F9 IX-Ч.СССР(пер)-1973 Разветвление I: 11.hg3 (0) |
[05 Авг 2018] | [Dambrete] |
64 lauciņu dambretes spēles oficiālie noteikumi (0) |
[03 Авг 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete Individuālais atklātņu repertuārs «APGRIEZTĀ DŪRE AR 1. c3-d4» (0) |
[01 Авг 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete Individuālais atklātņu repertuārs - «KUKUJEVA GAMBITS» (0) |
[20 Июл 2018] | [Dambrete] |
Individuālā atklātņu repertuāra veidošanas problēmas - Jaunā atklātne (0) |
[22 Мар 2016] | [Dambrete] |
Дрябезгов А. - Коськов Д. П-ф Чемп.СССР 1951 Игра Бодянского (0) |
[22 Мар 2016] | [Dambrete] |
Иванов В. - Блиндер С. XIV чемпионат СССР 1952 Обратная игра Бодянского (0) |
[27 Июл 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete PARTIJA NR. 22 - «APGRIEZTĀ BODJANSKA SPĒLE» (0) |
[07 Авг 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete Individuālais atklātņu repertuārs Ļ. RAMMA UN I. STERINA ANALĪZE (0) |
[29 Июл 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete Individuālais atklātņu repertuārs - «RĀMIS AR NOMAIŅU UZ g5» (0) |
[22 Мар 2016] | [Dambrete] |
Борухов С. - Арустамов Ю. XXXII чемпионат СССР 1972 Обратная игра Бодянского (0) |
[22 Июл 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete Individuālais atklātņu repertuārs PARTIJA NR.8 «Atsite» (0) |
[01 Авг 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete Individuālais atklātņu repertuārs - «KUKUJEVA GAMBITS» (0) |
[15 Авг 2018] | [Dambrete] |
Стартовал Кубок информационных технологий 2018 (0) |
[20 Мар 2016] | [Dambrete] |
Кузюков Ю. - Мурсалов Э. ЦС ДСО Буревестник 1975 Безымянное начало (0) |
[24 Июл 2018] | [Dambrete] |
V. ADAMOVIČS Dambrete Individuālais atklātņu repertuārs - «KRUSTOJUMS» (0) |
[13 Июн 2021] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Гроссмейстер с мировым именем рассказал, зачем ходит в тренажерку (0) |
[13 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Г. Нарчук - Б. Кузнецов Вилочка Уроки 11,12 и 13 стр.115-116 Чемпионат ВС СССР, 1977 г (0) |
[13 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Игрa Филиппова-Блиндера Жертва Шмульяна-Маркачёва Г. Хацкевич, 25 уроков шашечной игры (0) |
[10 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(249) Игра С. Дьячкова Уроки 9 и 10 - $1.Позиции со связкой правого фланга стр.102 (0) |
[10 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
M. Бурковский - Б.Берлинков Игра Бодянского 25 уроков шашечной игры Г. Хацкевич, 1979 (0) |
[09 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
M. Фазылов - Ю. Арустамов № 7. Игра Каулена Уроки 23,24 и 25 - стр.214-215 (0) |
[09 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
А. Фомин - А. Плакхин Игра Бодянского 25-м чемпионате СССР 1965 г. Г. Хацкевич, 1979 (0) |
[09 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
В.Голосуев - Н. Шагин, 1967 г. Игра Бодянского Урок 20 - стр.185 (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(449) Уроки 23,24 и 25 - $4.Жертва Кукуева стр.242-255 (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(449) Уроки 23,24 и 25 - $4.Жертва Кукуева стр.242-255 (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(449) Уроки 23,24 и 25 - $4.Жертва Кукуева стр.242-255 (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
А. Рист - Э. Рыбаков Полуфинал 23-го первенства СССР, 1963 г. Кол Сокова (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Н. Абациев - В. Максимчук Чемпионат ВС СССР, 1975 г. Отыгрыш 25 уроков шашечной игры (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Н. Абациев - В. Максимчук Чемпионат ВС СССР, 1975 г. Отыгрыш 25 уроков шашечной игры, 1979 (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(311) Уроки 14 и 15 - $3.Задания для самостоятельного решения (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(310) Уроки 14 и 15 - $2.Практические партии (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Г. Петрович - А. Хапалюк Первенство БГУ, 1965 г Обратная игра Бодянского (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(305) Уроки 14 и 15 - $1.Позиции со связкой левого фланга (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
Г. Петрович - А. Хапалюк Первенство БГУ, 1965 г Обратная игра Бодянского (0) |
[02 Мар 2016] | [25 Уроков Шашки] |
(296) Уроки 14 и 15 - $1.Позиции со связкой левого фланга (0) |
[19 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 392 - 20(38) - 1983, Киевская защита, Комбинационные приемы, (0) |
[19 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 078-01(06) 1983, Кол, Связанные шашки (0) |
[18 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 260-50(33) -1983, Киевская защита, Комбинационные приемы, (0) |
[17 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 381 - 05(38) - 1983, Тычок, Комбинационные приемы, (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 084 - 10(06) - 1983, Связанные шашки, Тычок, (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 270 - 14 (34)-1983, Соковский кол (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 141 - 08(09) - 1983, Тычок, опорные точки, активные шашки, (0) |
[16 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 146-14(09) 1983, Соковский кол (0) |
[15 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 432-24(310) 1983 (0) |
[15 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 046 - 22(03) - 1983, Безымянное начало, Комбинационные приемы, (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 25-18(02) 1983 (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 445 - 04(55) - 1983, Безымянное начало, Комбинационные приемы, (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 315 - 15 (36) 1983 (0) |
[14 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 047 - 23(03) - 1983, Безымянное начало, Комбинационные приемы, (0) |
[13 Май 2024] | [Kabe Keskmäng] |
Пуусепп Оскар - 264 - 5 (34) 1983 (0) |
|